Woodlake
20th May 2004, 10:06
I'm trying to get my head around aspect ratio's and just have a question:
This was a quote from an old thread by Arachnotron:
"Suppose it (your capture card) is 52.15µs. In that case, cap 704x576, and add 16 black pixels to get 720x576 (or let your MPG2 encoder do it for you) and the AR of the DVD is correct."
I cant work out why you would pad the video.
If I capture at 704x576 (PAL) (which has an active picture area of 702x576) and take the same capture, and pad it out to 720x576 (which has the SAME active area AND AR of 128/117) - wouldn't both of these display exactly the same on a tv?
If this is the case I assume that the only reason you would capture at a higher resolution would be if your capture card captures higher than 52.15 µs?
Woodlake
This was a quote from an old thread by Arachnotron:
"Suppose it (your capture card) is 52.15µs. In that case, cap 704x576, and add 16 black pixels to get 720x576 (or let your MPG2 encoder do it for you) and the AR of the DVD is correct."
I cant work out why you would pad the video.
If I capture at 704x576 (PAL) (which has an active picture area of 702x576) and take the same capture, and pad it out to 720x576 (which has the SAME active area AND AR of 128/117) - wouldn't both of these display exactly the same on a tv?
If this is the case I assume that the only reason you would capture at a higher resolution would be if your capture card captures higher than 52.15 µs?
Woodlake