Luke_A_P
8th April 2004, 15:27
I'm trying to find an optimum combination of format and settings for creating video for playback on PocketPC. My test device at the moment is an iPAQ 4150, (320x240 screen 400MHz Xscale processor).
I am interested in Real Video 10 because of its excellent performance at low bitrates. However I am having trouble finding settings that will playback perfectly. If anyone can give me any recomendations based on knowledge or experience I would be very greatful.
For those who may be interested here is my take on the competitors in the pocketPC video world:
-
Windows media is not really an option since the playback performance of the PocketPC player is so poor.
-
The freely available PocketMVP player can playback full screen (320x240) divx/xvid video very well. It can handle bitrates high enough to make artifactling barely noticable on the small screen (~250kbps video I find). That does lead to quite large file sizes though.
-
With RV10 I have found that some files play back very well whilst others will stutter quite badly, I am trying to work out what causes the problem. The trouble is there are so many variables to play with that it becomes quite tricky to diagnose.
I am using 2 pass encoding with fixed total bitrate, all clips are resampled to 320x"whatever is appropriate for the aspect ratio", the clips have audio in the form of 56kbps real audio, and they are all at 25 or 24fps. Also note all the files play back well on PC it is only the PocketPC which suffers the stuttering.
The problem doesn't appear to be related to the average bitrate, I made some files with ~200kbps video which playback fine, and some at ~140kbps which don't.
Peak bitrate could be the issue but I have tried turning it down and it seems to have made no difference.
One factor that seemed to make a difference was changing from "normal motion video" to "sharpest image". I made files from the same source clip using each of these settings and at at very similar bitrates, only the "sharpest image" one stuttered.
(The comparison was not perfect, because of a mistake on my part the audio track was blank on the "normal motion video" clip, The audio track was present but it was empty.)
I was expecting this setting simply to control the processing of high frequency information in the image in a standard "blurriness vs. artifacts" relationship but I can't see why that should have much effect on playback performance. Can anyone explain more about what this setting does?
Any other input would be great too.
Thanks
Luke
I am interested in Real Video 10 because of its excellent performance at low bitrates. However I am having trouble finding settings that will playback perfectly. If anyone can give me any recomendations based on knowledge or experience I would be very greatful.
For those who may be interested here is my take on the competitors in the pocketPC video world:
-
Windows media is not really an option since the playback performance of the PocketPC player is so poor.
-
The freely available PocketMVP player can playback full screen (320x240) divx/xvid video very well. It can handle bitrates high enough to make artifactling barely noticable on the small screen (~250kbps video I find). That does lead to quite large file sizes though.
-
With RV10 I have found that some files play back very well whilst others will stutter quite badly, I am trying to work out what causes the problem. The trouble is there are so many variables to play with that it becomes quite tricky to diagnose.
I am using 2 pass encoding with fixed total bitrate, all clips are resampled to 320x"whatever is appropriate for the aspect ratio", the clips have audio in the form of 56kbps real audio, and they are all at 25 or 24fps. Also note all the files play back well on PC it is only the PocketPC which suffers the stuttering.
The problem doesn't appear to be related to the average bitrate, I made some files with ~200kbps video which playback fine, and some at ~140kbps which don't.
Peak bitrate could be the issue but I have tried turning it down and it seems to have made no difference.
One factor that seemed to make a difference was changing from "normal motion video" to "sharpest image". I made files from the same source clip using each of these settings and at at very similar bitrates, only the "sharpest image" one stuttered.
(The comparison was not perfect, because of a mistake on my part the audio track was blank on the "normal motion video" clip, The audio track was present but it was empty.)
I was expecting this setting simply to control the processing of high frequency information in the image in a standard "blurriness vs. artifacts" relationship but I can't see why that should have much effect on playback performance. Can anyone explain more about what this setting does?
Any other input would be great too.
Thanks
Luke