datascab
1st April 2004, 11:39
Hi,
I've been doing some avi to mpv conversions.
On some files, even though I specify an avg. bitrate of 4500kbs, i get 3000kbs etc thus the file is undersize.
As I understand it, this means that the source didnt require such a high bitrate, something like quality saturation.
If I input the corresponding bitrate for CBR encoding I get the calculated file size.
However does this mean I am wasting bits?
Since I am burning to dvd, this is not a problem since the aim is to fill the disk and achieve best quality.
Is there any downside to encoding CBR and achieving 100% file size (making full use of the disk)?
One this that does appeal to me is that the CBR process is 1 pass so encoding times are reduced by 1/2.
Some files i have encoded have made full use of the disk with 2-p VBR encoding. These seem to be the 2 cd rip versions.
In the case of these.... would CBR 1-p encoding yield as good results as the 2-p VBR method?
THanks
Data
I've been doing some avi to mpv conversions.
On some files, even though I specify an avg. bitrate of 4500kbs, i get 3000kbs etc thus the file is undersize.
As I understand it, this means that the source didnt require such a high bitrate, something like quality saturation.
If I input the corresponding bitrate for CBR encoding I get the calculated file size.
However does this mean I am wasting bits?
Since I am burning to dvd, this is not a problem since the aim is to fill the disk and achieve best quality.
Is there any downside to encoding CBR and achieving 100% file size (making full use of the disk)?
One this that does appeal to me is that the CBR process is 1 pass so encoding times are reduced by 1/2.
Some files i have encoded have made full use of the disk with 2-p VBR encoding. These seem to be the 2 cd rip versions.
In the case of these.... would CBR 1-p encoding yield as good results as the 2-p VBR method?
THanks
Data