goauld
21st March 2004, 11:03
Normally I use GordianKnot with DIVX for movies that are interesting for me (and I get a really good quality) but AGK migth be a fast way to code a movie when I don't have time to play around with the movie.
Currently I'm coding some movies using XVID 1.0 RC3 and AGK. The results are good (good quality and easy!!) but I realized that, at least in my tests, that XVID is slower than DIVX (I did several movies twice, one using xvid 1.0rc3 and another using divx 5.1.1Pro)
I've codec some movies manually using XVID 1.0rc3/GK/VirtualDubMod/etc and the coding is slow too (faster if I use **Turbo** option). I must admit that I know little about xvid but I fallow several xvid 1.0 guides.
So my question is: why xvid coding is so slow? (at least for me)
And thx to len0x by AGK (it's a nice tool)
Cheerio!
Currently I'm coding some movies using XVID 1.0 RC3 and AGK. The results are good (good quality and easy!!) but I realized that, at least in my tests, that XVID is slower than DIVX (I did several movies twice, one using xvid 1.0rc3 and another using divx 5.1.1Pro)
I've codec some movies manually using XVID 1.0rc3/GK/VirtualDubMod/etc and the coding is slow too (faster if I use **Turbo** option). I must admit that I know little about xvid but I fallow several xvid 1.0 guides.
So my question is: why xvid coding is so slow? (at least for me)
And thx to len0x by AGK (it's a nice tool)
Cheerio!