minolta
27th February 2004, 04:44
When non-HD material is broadcast as HDTV, it appears to be "bicubic" resized to HD resolution. This can make it difficult to determine the original resolution. Consider the following caps taken from Leno, Raymond, and Dave:
http://www.vrac.iastate.edu/~chadspen/leno.jpg
Leno: 1920x540 field on left; 740x240 field on right.
http://www.vrac.iastate.edu/~chadspen/raymond.jpg
Raymond: 1920x1080 decombed frame on left; 720x240 frame on right.
http://www.vrac.iastate.edu/~chadspen/dave.jpg
Dave: 1920x540 field on left; 740x240 field on right.
The left image is cropped from the original HD, while the right image is first Lanczos downsized to 720x480 and then Lanczos upsized to the original 1920x1080. I know this is not very scientific, but its an easy way to compare.
All caps were taken with things in focus and little movement. The Leno clip is noticeably blurred by this operation. Since the show is indeed shot with 1080i cameras this is not surprising. The Raymond clip is also widescreen HD, but does not appear to be affected (not much, anyway). This did not surprise me, since this show has always appeared blurry or smoothed. Perhaps its the camera filters they use, or could it be upscaled from DVD quality? Last is Dave, which is almost certainly upscaled from NTSC (although, overly strong bicubic w/ ugly color distortion).
Worse yet, movies broadcast in HD often look like upscaled DVD as well. Is there any way to "scientifically" determine the effective resolution? I've tried running tests using avisynth's Compare(), but the results don't look too promising. Is there any such measure?
Thanks,
Minolta
http://www.vrac.iastate.edu/~chadspen/leno.jpg
Leno: 1920x540 field on left; 740x240 field on right.
http://www.vrac.iastate.edu/~chadspen/raymond.jpg
Raymond: 1920x1080 decombed frame on left; 720x240 frame on right.
http://www.vrac.iastate.edu/~chadspen/dave.jpg
Dave: 1920x540 field on left; 740x240 field on right.
The left image is cropped from the original HD, while the right image is first Lanczos downsized to 720x480 and then Lanczos upsized to the original 1920x1080. I know this is not very scientific, but its an easy way to compare.
All caps were taken with things in focus and little movement. The Leno clip is noticeably blurred by this operation. Since the show is indeed shot with 1080i cameras this is not surprising. The Raymond clip is also widescreen HD, but does not appear to be affected (not much, anyway). This did not surprise me, since this show has always appeared blurry or smoothed. Perhaps its the camera filters they use, or could it be upscaled from DVD quality? Last is Dave, which is almost certainly upscaled from NTSC (although, overly strong bicubic w/ ugly color distortion).
Worse yet, movies broadcast in HD often look like upscaled DVD as well. Is there any way to "scientifically" determine the effective resolution? I've tried running tests using avisynth's Compare(), but the results don't look too promising. Is there any such measure?
Thanks,
Minolta