Log in

View Full Version : realvideo 10 in avisynth

starwarsandrisk
14th February 2004, 00:00
alrighty... heres the issue... i've encoded two different showings of the same file in rv10.... each with different filters.... applied.... i wanna seem them both side by side to look at the difference.... i used avisynth to do it before i encoded them... but now i wanna see both of them after encoding.... problem is.... i can't find a directshow filter for rv10..... as far as gabest's realvideo splitter it only does rv9.... so what am i supposed to do here?... or is there another program i can use....
RadicalEd
14th February 2004, 00:46
Where are you getting the idea that Gabest's filter only does rv9? Not true... especially because rv10 is rv9 ;)
starwarsandrisk
14th February 2004, 00:58
hmm.... okay then.... so.... okay.... i got it working... but it says "i can't detirimine framerate"...... how do i fix that?.... sorry... kinda a avisynth noob
Bogalvator
14th February 2004, 02:24
DirectShowSource("yourfile.rmvb",fps=???)

Where ??? is your framerate (most likely 23.976, 25 or 29.97, depending on your source)
RadicalEd
14th February 2004, 02:28
Most of the time, you'll need to supply the framerate of the video to avisynth when using directshowsource.
DirectShowSource(clip, fps) where clip is the video file/variable and fps is some framerate (i.e. 29.97). The avisynth doc says fps is an int, but I *think* that's a typo.

If you don't know the original framerate, open the file in wmp 6.4 (start>run>mplayer2), go to File>Properties>Advanced and open the Video Renderer. Average frame rate achieved should be close to some standard fps (23.976, 24, 25, 29.97, 30), so use the closest logical value.

edit- beaten to it :P
bond
14th February 2004, 10:12
i like the way how big companies are making their costumers think they have a new codec :D
its good to get costumers pay again for the "new stuff"

in fact rv10 output is technically the same as rv9 (you see this because of backwards compatibility for example)
the same goes for the "new" wm9 stuff too of course

hm, maybe if dxn would have done it the same way we now would have divx21 (and they would have earned more money):
"wow already 21, must be a great codec" :D