Blue_MiSfit
30th December 2003, 22:43
Hey all...
I had a quick question about XviD 1.0 beta 3's included alternative matricies. I am interested in using them, but haven't the time to do some real comparisons myself. I was wondering if anyone has worked with these new matricies and what they found with them? I have used MPEG and h263 in previous builds.
I tried out hvs - best on a 760some-odd kbit encode at 608x320 (DVD source) and it seemed to give a lot of noise and wierd "swimming" artificacts.
anyways... before I re-encode with H263 - if anyone had suggestions as to an alternative matrix more in-tune with my encode?
thanks everyone
~misfit
btw PROPS for selam. It's very very nice.
I had a quick question about XviD 1.0 beta 3's included alternative matricies. I am interested in using them, but haven't the time to do some real comparisons myself. I was wondering if anyone has worked with these new matricies and what they found with them? I have used MPEG and h263 in previous builds.
I tried out hvs - best on a 760some-odd kbit encode at 608x320 (DVD source) and it seemed to give a lot of noise and wierd "swimming" artificacts.
anyways... before I re-encode with H263 - if anyone had suggestions as to an alternative matrix more in-tune with my encode?
thanks everyone
~misfit
btw PROPS for selam. It's very very nice.