View Full Version : Interlaced Progressive video?
eng3
26th December 2003, 09:21
I recorded some video using my MyHD.
It was from FOX 480p.
I thought the p meant progressive, non-interlaced, but the video looks interlaced. There are many jagged edges, though fielddeinterlace does nothing.
any suggestions on what might be going on?
trbarry
26th December 2003, 18:00
Much of Fox 480p is just interlaced material that has gone through their own deinterlacer, sometimes with not very good results.
I don't belive they use any 480p @ 60 (or higher) cameras at all but at least some film source really is a decent 480p.
- Tom
eng3
26th December 2003, 20:42
Originally posted by trbarry
Much of Fox 480p is just interlaced material that has gone through their own deinterlacer, sometimes with not very good results.
I don't belive they use any 480p @ 60 (or higher) cameras at all but at least some film source really is a decent 480p.
- Tom
ah. hmm, so should I still try deinterlacing?
FieldDeinterlace didnt make any difference.
_PN_
26th December 2003, 22:34
I dont know much about Fox 480p streams since I just don't stream that station, but some German stations have streams similar to the ones You describe. The flag supposes the stream to be progressive, but when You have a look at it You find Yourself in interlace wonderland. Since I don't reencode that stuff at all this will never affect me in any way. If I had to deal with this stuff because I want to reencode or such, I would use kernel deinterlacing via avisynth. You could also try to do some frame-based deinterlacing instead of field-based... or both. These would just be my ideas about it.
abman
30th December 2003, 05:28
Originally posted by Enrico Ng
ah. hmm, so should I still try deinterlacing?
FieldDeinterlace didnt make any difference.
nah, you're getting a progressive stream, its just there are some interlace artifacts left by their encoder. Local fox stations have been frustrating a lot of people. I have a friend who gets a 1080i on his fox which is usually film transferred to 480p then converted to 1080i. he's concluded he can't really get a clean xvid made off that. Best thing is to just wait until fox goes to true hdtv next fall. :)
auenf
2nd January 2004, 12:51
Originally posted by abman
nah, you're getting a progressive stream, its just there are some interlace artifacts left by their encoder. Local fox stations have been frustrating a lot of people. I have a friend who gets a 1080i on his fox which is usually film transferred to 480p then converted to 1080i. he's concluded he can't really get a clean xvid made off that. Best thing is to just wait until fox goes to true hdtv next fall. :)
sounds like the compulsary HD broadcasts here are a good thing then, altho some of the programs that have been chosen to be broadcast in HD are a bit of a worry...
Enf...
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.