BeSweet's gain method for lists

[ikerrg]

Yes I'm interested (if not I had not asked about information), and now I'm searching in the forum.

Well, I'm going to use PreGain in 1.5 with normalize to 100% (it does 2-pass). I think it should be the same as azid's --maximize command.

Do you think that these next two command lines will have the same quality output?

Command A:
"C:\Archivos de programa\Ripping\BeSweet\BeSweet.exe" -core( -input "C:\Archivos de programa\Ripping\BeSweet\pelicula.lst" -output "d:\pelicula.wav" -substream 0x81 -2ch ) -azid( -z1 -b1 -equit -s surround2 -d 2/0 -c normal -L -3db ) -ota( -g max ) -profile( ~~~~~ Default Profile ~~~~~ )

Command B:
"C:\Archivos de programa\Ripping\BeSweet\BeSweet.exe" -core( -input "C:\Archivos de programa\Ripping\BeSweet\pelicula.lst" -output "d:\pelicula.wav" -substream 0x81 -2ch ) -azid( -z1 -b1 -equit -s surround2 -d 2/0 -c normal -L -3db --maximize ) -profile( ~~~~~ Default Profile ~~~~~ )

Thank you and Bye.

[DSPguru]

pregain and azid's gain should have the same quality.
on rare cases, pregain would achieve better quality than azid's.
the first-pass of azid is faster than pregain's.

personally, i use hybridgain.