ChristianHJW
1st July 2003, 23:11
Hi,
no this is NOT going to be an advertising thread for another container format. I assume its close to zero, but i'd like to know anyhow ( just nosey ).
The dummy frame itself has a value of 0, so i assume its 1 byte and it really shouldnt add anything, i guess the only extra overhead is due to the fact that the b-frame packed with the I/P frame into one single AVI chunk needs some additional bytes in the chunk so it can be separated/differentiated from the preceding frame ?
Can any XviD dev with indeep knowledge about the bitstream give me a rough figure, say based on an encoding with only 1 b-frame on a 200,000 frame movie and an estimated 10,000 b-frames in it ?
Thanks ...
no this is NOT going to be an advertising thread for another container format. I assume its close to zero, but i'd like to know anyhow ( just nosey ).
The dummy frame itself has a value of 0, so i assume its 1 byte and it really shouldnt add anything, i guess the only extra overhead is due to the fact that the b-frame packed with the I/P frame into one single AVI chunk needs some additional bytes in the chunk so it can be separated/differentiated from the preceding frame ?
Can any XviD dev with indeep knowledge about the bitstream give me a rough figure, say based on an encoding with only 1 b-frame on a 200,000 frame movie and an estimated 10,000 b-frames in it ?
Thanks ...