Log in

View Full Version : 3ivx D4 4.0.4


Stux
17th April 2003, 09:29
3ivx D4 4.0.4 has been released

http://www.3ivx.com/download

Enjoy :)

--

New Features

DirectShow Video Decoder
* Fast Seeking

DirectShow Media Splitter
* Splitter now has the option of using unsupported decoders


Improvements

DirectShow Media Splitter
* Splitter now is a preferred filter

DirectShow Video Decoder
* Increased maximum priority

Core
* Encoder quality improvements
* Encoder efficiency improvements


Bugs Fixed

DirectShow Audio Decoder
* Framed audio is now handled correctly

DirectShow Media Splitter
* Framed audio is now handled correctly

Video for Windows (VfW) Codec
* ICM_SET/GETSTATE now work

Core
* QPel decoding bug fixed

QuickTime Codec
* HTTP/RTSP streaming dead-lock fixed
* HTTP/RTSP streaming framedropping fixed
* HTTP/RTSP streaming post-filters fixed
* Fixed Final Cut Pro decoding
* Fixed Final Cut Pro encoding

Windows Installer
* Bug which caused problems in many VfW applications (Adobe Premiere, Vegas Video, DVDx etc) was fixed


Known Bugs

DirectShow Media Splitter
* MP4/MOV files with track offsets play out of sync

DirectShow Audio Decoder
* MPEG-4 AAC LTP audio is not decoded correctly

Video for Windows (VfW) Codec
* FFmpeg encoded multi-bframe clips cause a crash when stepping in
VirtualDub


Unknown Bugs


Missing Features


Permanent Issues

Core
* XviD streams prior to build0000 (ie up to and including 0.9 stable
series) with non-multiples of 16 are not MPEG-4 compliant and exhibit
occasional glitches. There is no work-around.

ookzDVD
17th April 2003, 10:46
Hmmm... It's still not support the 2-pass mode :(

Nic
17th April 2003, 11:03
A definite step in the right direction :)
Thanks for listening to our pleading ;)

Cheers,
-Nic

Valky
17th April 2003, 11:48
Originally posted by ookzDVD
Hmmm... It's still not support the 2-pass mode :(


Doesn't matter to me if anything else is working good.

RM9 -codec have proved many times that there is absolutely no need to do more than one pass and it can still beat other codecs in many situations..Why? Because no matter how many passes you are gonna do, the macroblocks with other codecs are still there when using low bitrates. But they are never there when using RM9. Under water scenes, fire, fog..all without that horrible pixelation.
I don't use DivX 5.04 just because I can use n+1 passes, do you?

But seriously I am gonna give this a try. I have already used previous one many times when testing avs-scripts (Speed is very nice) and sometimes even replaced my huffy with it when editing clips and my HD is on pretty low capacity. So I hope you have added something like 120% quality to that codec :)

CaptainCarrot
17th April 2003, 12:39
Hi,
I wanted to try out the 3ivx-codec, but after the installation oggmux gui and vdubmod were hanging when i tried to open an *.avi with divx and ac3-content (maybe for other content, too, i didn't try). I uninstalled the 3ivx codec while vdubmod was hanging, and as soon as the deinstaller was finished, my avi was opened. :confused:
Btw. Playback in Zoomplayer worked all the time.
Just to let everyone know...

Sirber
18th April 2003, 13:43
Originally posted by Valky
Doesn't matter to me if anything else is working good.

RM9 -codec have proved many times that there is absolutely no need to do more than one pass and it can still beat other codecs in many situations..Why? Because no matter how many passes you are gonna do, the macroblocks with other codecs are still there when using low bitrates. But they are never there when using RM9. Under water scenes, fire, fog..all without that horrible pixelation.
I don't use DivX 5.04 just because I can use n+1 passes, do you?

But seriously I am gonna give this a try. I have already used previous one many times when testing avs-scripts (Speed is very nice) and sometimes even replaced my huffy with it when editing clips and my HD is on pretty low capacity. So I hope you have added something like 120% quality to that codec :)

By RM9 you mean WM9 or RV9? There is no Real Media 9...

Valky
18th April 2003, 17:59
Originally posted by Sirber
By RM9 you mean WM9 or RV9? There is no Real Media 9...
I remember that I have saw this kind of deja vu earlier..from you :)

No offence of course..I guess I relly never remember what they call these days..but it will always be real media for me..RM=real media :)

if I use rv it's like real video for me but if the container include both audio and video, then I call it real media :)

Sirber
19th April 2003, 03:12
Oups... :)

Sorry for asking again ;) I'll use the search button instead next time :p