iwod
7th April 2003, 11:30
I remember reading it somewhere long time ago... that Divx should uses less CPU resources when decoding compare to RV9.
However recently i have discover RV9 can actually be decoded on a PentiumII 366 while Divx can't.. ( Well the video is ok but the sounds seems to run faster than the video. And when i run it on my computer there is no problem at all. )
However recenlty i have realize the plain that RV9 can not be edited.... ( >_< )
( i know not many of you here uses RV9... coz not much anime fans here.... or some use xvid. )
Is this the case with your computer... or is there something wrong with Divx decoder??
Coz i am certain that divx should play pretty well on a Pentium 366....
A side notes.......... it is th 7th of April today.. any news on Nero Digital yet?? I am truly excited about this new codec.
However recently i have discover RV9 can actually be decoded on a PentiumII 366 while Divx can't.. ( Well the video is ok but the sounds seems to run faster than the video. And when i run it on my computer there is no problem at all. )
However recenlty i have realize the plain that RV9 can not be edited.... ( >_< )
( i know not many of you here uses RV9... coz not much anime fans here.... or some use xvid. )
Is this the case with your computer... or is there something wrong with Divx decoder??
Coz i am certain that divx should play pretty well on a Pentium 366....
A side notes.......... it is th 7th of April today.. any news on Nero Digital yet?? I am truly excited about this new codec.