View Full Version : Deshaker by Gunnar Thalin
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
[
11]
Hi nji:
I often use stabbo to stabilize vhs footage:
https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=171250
I would never install that with so such a bad overall impression (see thread etc.)
Life is sometimes a surprise box
I would like to annotate that DeShaker doesn't account
- field of view (FoV)
- movements within a frame.
As consequence it produces good results only for parallel projection
(telephoto lenses) that have no movement within the scene;
like a photocopier where you move the paper while scanning ;).
Well, I have a different impression -- it handles on-screen motion well when positioned correctly. Certainly better than, for example, Mercalli, which generally does strange things when someone walks close to the camera :)
I used it to remove minor camera shakes and it did a very good job.
Of course, it has its drawbacks due to its simplicity.
Well, I have a different impression -- it handles on-screen motion well when positioned correctly. Certainly better than, for example, Mercalli, which generally does strange things when someone walks close to the camera :)
I used it to remove minor camera shakes and it did a very good job.
Of course, it has its drawbacks due to its simplicity.
I'm not about impression, but about maths.
Moreover I don't compare against Mercalli, but against the result of an alg accounting
the two mentioned aspects.
rgr
6th August 2025, 11:59
I know about these flaws, but thanks to great customization it works where other programs fail.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.