View Full Version : Fastest sharpen filter
Holomatrix
17th March 2003, 15:47
Hi, just wondering what sharpen filter to use that would not decrease encoded speed too much? I use AVISYNTH 2.08 also.
Thanks
Boulder
17th March 2003, 16:56
If UnFilter is defined as a sharpening filter, that's my 2 cents.
Holomatrix
17th March 2003, 18:53
Ok, thanks I'll try it out. What do you recommend as a setting? Unfilter(25,25) to notice a diff?
Thanks
FuPP
17th March 2003, 19:01
asharp is fast too, and probably better for compressibility.
Regards,
FuPP.
Holomatrix
17th March 2003, 19:15
is there a version of asharp for AVISYNTH 2.08? and what setting would you use?
Thanks
Boulder
17th March 2003, 21:10
Originally posted by Holomatrix
Ok, thanks I'll try it out. What do you recommend as a setting? Unfilter(25,25) to notice a diff?
Thanks
That depends a lot on the source. I use extra sharpening quite rarely, I do a sharp bicubic resizing if I need to sharpen, but maybe values from 20 to 40 will bring enough sharpness without making it much less compressible. Do some tests and you'll get the idea;)
Holomatrix
17th March 2003, 21:55
Ok, so you think going with presice Bicubic 0.75 does give a more sharper picture?
jorel
18th March 2003, 09:30
Originally posted by Boulder
If UnFilter is defined as a sharpening filter, that's my 2 cents.
yes Boulder ;)
you wrote too:
"That depends a lot on the source"
i'm with you.
@ Holomatrix
i use unfilter in all my encodes!
using
unfilter(10,10) or
unfilter(5,5)(very gentle way)
before Bicubic,
you got gentle sharpness.
is faster and clean!
congrats (again) to trbarry!
;)
Wilbert
18th March 2003, 09:58
is there a version of asharp for AVISYNTH 2.08? and what setting would you use?
No, sorry ...
Boulder
18th March 2003, 10:39
Originally posted by Holomatrix
Ok, so you think going with presice Bicubic 0.75 does give a more sharper picture?
I use Bicubic 0.6 since it's generally recommended as the highest value. If I want to have even more sharpening, I switch to Lanczos. But like I said, all depends on the source. On a TV capture material, Bicubic is needed to get sharpening whereas a DVD source should look good with a Bilinear IMO. Then again, Bilinear reduces the analog noise by softening the image:rolleyes:
Bilinear compresses a lot better than a sharp bicubic so the length of the movie affects my choice as well every time:)
I've noticed that my DVD player (or TV) sharpens the output so the result is sharper looking on the TV than on the PC display.
Holomatrix
18th March 2003, 12:48
Ok, thanks for all the help. I'll do some more testing in aliance to the info given here. Thanks again :)
Shayne
26th March 2003, 00:40
I also think that quant 3 does have a little blurring effect so my preview is always a little sharper then what I want as a final
Warp is nice and has it locations
and Unfilter works well for me also
I have also used the two of them combined
Holomatrix
26th March 2003, 12:44
I think I'm going to go with MSharpen, it's defaults are abit high for DVD but once I decrease abit all looks good :) fast, doesn't add noise and looks very good.
Thanks
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.