Hitokiri
15th March 2003, 14:24
I've been trying to get this one right for weeks now, I've put hours into testing and still haven't been able to get a nice result.
I've chosen for divx3.11 sbc in nandub, 2 cds with fs@544x400 and mp3@lame -alt--standard@173mb because I'm not sure how I would be able to get a 463mb ac3 file on a 2cd rip with nice quality fs video. If anyone thinks it is possible, I'd like some tips here..
Anway, I've uploaded 2 samples to my isp, one is encoded in 2 pass, with .stats file, and the other one is encoded without .stats file.
The first sample is 2.61mb in size (2 pass), the second 3.15mb (1 pass).
http://users.pandora.be/chronos/with-stats.avi
http://users.pandora.be/chronos/without-stats.avi
The 2 pass sample shows a very blocky and ugly image @ around 0m09s, where the other sample shows a clean image.
I notice that 2-pass encoding gives me a smaller filesize and relatively the same image quality (with the sample anyway), except that one scene @ 0m09s. Maybe the image of the 1 pass encode is slightly better, I don't know, what do you guys think?
I would like to use the 2 pass encoding method, so my main request here is that I'd like to know how I can eliminate the ugly image or the image quality in a whole.
Could it be that I don't have enough bits free to put into that scene because I'm only encoding 12 seconds, and that my problem will be solved when I encode the whole movie? I've already tried it with a 2 min sample, and I had the same problem though.
Here's my nandub configuration file:
http://users.pandora.be/chronos/harrypotter.vcf
If you guys need more info, just let me know.
Tia.
I've chosen for divx3.11 sbc in nandub, 2 cds with fs@544x400 and mp3@lame -alt--standard@173mb because I'm not sure how I would be able to get a 463mb ac3 file on a 2cd rip with nice quality fs video. If anyone thinks it is possible, I'd like some tips here..
Anway, I've uploaded 2 samples to my isp, one is encoded in 2 pass, with .stats file, and the other one is encoded without .stats file.
The first sample is 2.61mb in size (2 pass), the second 3.15mb (1 pass).
http://users.pandora.be/chronos/with-stats.avi
http://users.pandora.be/chronos/without-stats.avi
The 2 pass sample shows a very blocky and ugly image @ around 0m09s, where the other sample shows a clean image.
I notice that 2-pass encoding gives me a smaller filesize and relatively the same image quality (with the sample anyway), except that one scene @ 0m09s. Maybe the image of the 1 pass encode is slightly better, I don't know, what do you guys think?
I would like to use the 2 pass encoding method, so my main request here is that I'd like to know how I can eliminate the ugly image or the image quality in a whole.
Could it be that I don't have enough bits free to put into that scene because I'm only encoding 12 seconds, and that my problem will be solved when I encode the whole movie? I've already tried it with a 2 min sample, and I had the same problem though.
Here's my nandub configuration file:
http://users.pandora.be/chronos/harrypotter.vcf
If you guys need more info, just let me know.
Tia.