Log in

View Full Version : Quality Vs Resolution: Fight!


RMCF
1st March 2003, 15:38
Hi,

My DivX player on my TV stretches all movies to 640x480.

So my question is what will give me better quality do you think?

640xyyy Average Quant 4
or
512xyyy Average Quant 3


Regards

OvERaCiD23
1st March 2003, 20:44
640 if you're playing it back at full screen. 512 is just way too low IMO. An average quanitzer of 4 isn't horrible, and you'll lose details anyways on the TV. Maybe try going for another CD and getting 'wonderful quality' instead of 'okay quality'.

DJ Bobo
1st March 2003, 21:49
Definitely 512x... because of the higher quantizer. For me it can't be high enough! the higher the better ;)

Who said 512x... is too low? ¬.¬
You've gotta be kidding. You've gotta beat me if you care 2 minutes after you begin watching (remember the VHS days ;))

Comparing to the DVD is always the wrong way! because you'll never reach DVD level, even with quantizer 2 and highest resolution.
My motto: as less artifacts as possible!

RMCF
1st March 2003, 22:40
DJ Bobo, again I would incline to agree with you. Just wanted to hear what other people thought.

After encoding 512yyy minority report (which compresses badly) I have to say it looks pretty good.

Regards

Acaila
2nd March 2003, 01:23
I'd go for 512 also. For TV viewing that's high enough. The extra detail you get from using a 640 res probably won't even be visible on a TV, but the extra blocks would be.

Display on a monitor on the other hand is a completely different story.

Slogra
2nd March 2003, 13:11
i can see macroblock much easier on my tv because it has far greater contrast/color than a monitor. So i would also go for the 512 resolution.

RMCF
2nd March 2003, 15:14
Ok thanks all.