NightFear
3rd February 2003, 08:40
Some months ago I read in Derrows page that when you want to fit a bigger than 4,7GB DVD into a normal DVDR is to "TRANCODE" it using reMPEG2.
But I found some misunderstandings in Derrows manuals.
- In Derrows manual (Written by Taran) "Ripping DVD's that are too large to fit on a DVD-R" says to use:
SEARCH TECHNIQUE = FULL
PERFONMANCE = REFERENCE DCT
(This takes about 37h in a 2h movie)
- In Derrows manual "Transcoding using reMPEG2" says to use:
SEARCH TECHNIQUE = PREDICTION
PERFONMANCE = INTEGER DCT (FASTER)
(This takes about 6h in a 2h movie)
- What's the deference between the two techniques ?????
- Why is the reMPEG2 stacks at 99% of the coding and do nothing ???? (in both techniques)
- Does anyone know how to trancode a movie 180 min using reMPEG2 and still have the quallity of the original movie ???? (I tried a 170 min movie and I had some stacks, like missing frames)
ThanX._
:confused:
But I found some misunderstandings in Derrows manuals.
- In Derrows manual (Written by Taran) "Ripping DVD's that are too large to fit on a DVD-R" says to use:
SEARCH TECHNIQUE = FULL
PERFONMANCE = REFERENCE DCT
(This takes about 37h in a 2h movie)
- In Derrows manual "Transcoding using reMPEG2" says to use:
SEARCH TECHNIQUE = PREDICTION
PERFONMANCE = INTEGER DCT (FASTER)
(This takes about 6h in a 2h movie)
- What's the deference between the two techniques ?????
- Why is the reMPEG2 stacks at 99% of the coding and do nothing ???? (in both techniques)
- Does anyone know how to trancode a movie 180 min using reMPEG2 and still have the quallity of the original movie ???? (I tried a 170 min movie and I had some stacks, like missing frames)
ThanX._
:confused: