Log in

View Full Version : Matrix Reloaded new trailer


Garfield
28th January 2003, 12:11
Hi guys, probably most of you have probably seen it during the superbowl, but french people can only see it over the internet ;)

Here's the Divx version http://www.efrance.fr/garfield900/Trailer_Matrix_2.avi

And here you'll find the orginal quick time trailers

320*144 (http://progressive.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/progressive/thematrix/us/med/superbowltrailer320_dl.mov)/480*224 (http://progressive.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/progressive/thematrix/us/med/superbowltrailer480_dl.mov)/640*288 (http://progressive.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/progressive/thematrix/us/med/superbowltrailer640_dl.mov)

That's awesome :)

The Edge
28th January 2003, 13:17
I have to say it looks amazing. I can't wait till it's released :cool:
I heard on the radio that Keanu Reeves took a $70 million dollar pay cut so the special effects could be finished. He is my new hero. ;)

Edge

midiguy
28th January 2003, 15:26
Originally posted by The Edge
I have to say it looks amazing. I can't wait till it's released :cool:
I heard on the radio that Keanu Reeves took a $70 million dollar pay cut so the special effects could be finished. He is my new hero. ;)

Edge
yeah, if that's true, that's pretty descent.

The Belgain
28th January 2003, 15:33
That trailer looks incredible! I don't know if I'll be able to wait till November though....aaarrghhhH!

Edit: oops...the first one's out in May. Yay!

The Edge
28th January 2003, 16:21
I've watched it a few times now and it is just amazing!
end of text.


Edge

CaPPyD
28th January 2003, 16:49
Originally posted by The Edge
I have to say it looks amazing. I can't wait till it's released :cool:
I heard on the radio that Keanu Reeves took a $70 million dollar pay cut so the special effects could be finished. He is my new hero. ;)

Edge

Do you mean $70 million or $7 million? i cant believe that keanu was gonna get paid enough that he could afford a $70 million pay cut. and if he was getting paid enough that he could afford that, then Hollywood has lost their minds!!!!!!!!!

:D

cube
28th January 2003, 19:45
Originally posted by CaPPyD
Do you mean $70 million or $7 million? i cant believe that keanu was gonna get paid enough that he could afford a $70 million pay cut. and if he was getting paid enough that he could afford that, then Hollywood has lost their minds!!!!!!!!!

:D

Wait... Hollywood had minds to begin with?

The Matrix (and it's sequels) was also filmed mainly in Sydney, AU :)

wmansir
28th January 2003, 21:57
I haven't heard the story, but there is no way it was $70 million, perhaps $7 million. But if he did that I'm sure it wasn't a gift, he probably got a couple (more) points on the box office.

I'm usually not a big fan of sequels, but I have to admit I will be going to see these movies. I also think it is really cool that WB is taking a risk and releasing both movies just a few months apart. Hopefully, the DVD for the first sequel will hit the streets just before the third one hits theaters. I haven't heard any plans to that effect, but it would make sense to me.

mpucoder
28th January 2003, 22:05
The way I heard it, doing principle shooting for both movies at the same time saved a lot of money. It's the same way with episodic television, second and third units shoot on location or "backlot" with actors not involved with the studio unit. Actors get shuffled around, but the crews stay put, saves a lot on transportation. No doubt the post-production for the third movie has not started yet.

CaPPyD
28th January 2003, 23:53
Originally posted by CaPPyD
Do you mean $70 million or $7 million? i cant believe that keanu was gonna get paid enough that he could afford a $70 million pay cut. and if he was getting paid enough that he could afford that, then Hollywood has lost their minds!!!!!!!!!

:D

Okay, my interest was piqued, so I went to IMDB on a whim. From here, (http://us.imdb.com/Bio?Reeves,%20Keanu) we can see that Keanu made 10 mil for the first and 15 mil for each sequel.

Salary
Matrix Revolutions, The (2003) $15,000,000
Matrix Reloaded, The (2003) $15,000,000
Replacements, The (2000) $12,500,000
Matrix, The (1999) $10,000,000
Devil's Advocate, The (1997) $8,000,000


So, there is no way that he took a 70 million hit when he only made 40 million for the trilogy total. Suddenly the 7 million hit is seeming more reasonable.

In any case, it doesnt matter how much he made as both of these movies are gonna be just amazing!

The Edge
29th January 2003, 00:17
I heard that on the radio this morning but yes, $7million does sound a bit more reasonable.
Probably just a glitch in the matrix. :)

Edge

Jazz
29th January 2003, 10:51
Also - consider what the special effects would be like if Keanu donated $70 million to the good cause of finishing them...! Come to think of it, $7 million is then still a boatload of money.

wmansir
29th January 2003, 13:34
Well, over at Chud.com's boards someone posted this, copied from IMDB
Generous actor Keanu Reeves has sacrificed a massive $38 million to prevent the two new Matrix films being scrapped. The Speed hunk gave up his claim to a cut of the films' ticket sales when producers began fearing the box office would not cover the costs of making the special effects-laden flicks. The gesture is one of the most generous ever in Hollywood and has stunned studio bosses. A Warner Bros. insider says, "The special effects in the new movie are beyond belief - but hugely expensive. There was a real danger the projects would be scrapped until Keanu offered to sign away his cut. He has kissed goodbye to a huge sum of money." Keanu was paid $10 million for the first Matrix movie in 1999 and picked up a further $35 million as his cut of worldwide box office sales.

So it looks like it was alot closer to $70 million than I would have ever though. So, The Edge probably did hear $70 million, since it's a cut of the BO that Keanu gave up it could really be any amount, and in order to build the story it was probably reported as something like "up to $70 million".

There is NO way the studio would "scrap" the matrix sequals due to budget concerns. These sequals are like money in the bank. They could just film Neo taking a dump and, as long as it was in bullet time, it would make $200mil per film. Look at that piece of garbage MIB II, it was absolutely horrible and it pulled almost 200 domestic.

The Edge
29th January 2003, 13:41
Thanks for the info wmansir.
Yes, Neo having a dump in bullet time sounds excellect.:)

Edge

Ookami
29th January 2003, 18:57
Originally posted by wmansir
There is NO way the studio would "scrap" the matrix sequals due to budget concerns. These sequals are like money in the bank. They could just film Neo taking a dump and, as long as it was in bullet time, it would make $200mil per film. Look at that piece of garbage MIB II, it was absolutely horrible and it pulled almost 200 domestic.

Oooh, you're soo right! :D This reminds me of the comments that Stephen King could publish a phonebook and it would still sell like crazy :) .

rmatei
29th January 2003, 23:26
Really looking forward to the movies. I think the material is ripe for a trilogy that'll go down in film history. I hope they'll have the courage to delve more into the philosophical questions and the way it's a parable of modern society, in addition to the action. It'd be a shame if this turned into Die Hard-style action blockbuster franchise.

Also, if you want to see great, better-than-DVD picture quality, check out the high def, quicktime version of the teaser.
http://whatisthematrix.warnerbros.com/mov/reloaded_teaser_1_1024.zip

CaPPyD
30th January 2003, 00:05
gotta agree with you there... i think that the matrix trilogy will be to our generation what star wars was to our parent's generation. As long as the Wachowski's dont go back and make prequels in 20 years, we'll be okay!