Avisynth 2.0x FREE configuration-results

[drebel]

After having recently re-formated ,i decided to use only avisynth 2.5 as a frameserver.For that :

-1.placed avisynth.dll(2.5 latest version) in system32 folder
-2.renamed virtualdubmod.exe to virtualdub.exe in virtualdub folder of GordianKnot 0.27(and replaced the original one)
-3.put all nedded dlls in there
-4.checked "use alternative mpeg2dec" to mpeg2dec3 and put the last one in gnot folder
-5.placed all avisynth2.5 plugins in gnot's folder
-6.renamed calc.exe(a small widows calulator fron /winnt folder )to vStrip_gui.exe (i'm not currently using vstrip,but i have great need of a calculator for mod4-mod8 resolutions-sorry,i'm not Einstein:) ).That way,the first page of gnot calls the calculator...
-7.replaced mplayer2.exe (windows media player6.4) to mediaplayerclassic(mplayer2c.exe->mplayer2)through safe mode(win2000 keeps replacing the original file)

Now,one could open-edit yv12 avs through GordianKnot ,make comp checks with divx3.11 or divx5(Yes!.nandub opens yv12 scripts,but of course results in yuy2 mode output :( ...).So Nandub users can benefit from yv12 filters without making the "convert to yuy2"trick :D until soneone finds a way to hack divx3.11 to output yv12 as well(personally,i dont find it necessary -i'm an xvid user anyway:cool: )

No avisynth 2.07 anywhere!
The only disadvantage is some filters still ported to yuy2,but all i need right now is already in yv12

PS: i really feel the need to apologise to all developers for this "brutal" invasion to their programs (especially @the Wef)

regards,
george

[Wilbert]

until soneone finds a way to hack divx3.11 to output yv12 as well
Are you sure about this? I though that divx3.11 could also output to YV12?

[drebel]

According to ddshow info panel...
I really dont know anything else,but i thought that panel was reliable

EDIT: You were wright Wilbert!3.11 outputs yv12!Great :)

win2000sp3,dx8.1
It's easier to make comp check comparisons this way:D

regards,
george

[Stereodude]

Isn't the better question why you're relying solely on alpha software? It says right in the thread that you should only use it for testing, not for regular use.

Stereodude

[drebel]

REALLY? I'm using xvid ang a huge amount of alpha software with no complaints for more than a year now...:)

[drebel]

... not to mention ~700 full encodings with @cult...

[Stereodude]

Originally posted by drebel
REALLY? I'm using xvid ang a huge amount of alpha software with no complaints for more than a year now...:) There's a big difference between Alphas, stable betas, and works in progress.

Stereodude

[seewen]

Originally posted by Stereodude
Isn't the better question why you're relying solely on alpha software? It says right in the thread that you should only use it for testing, not for regular use.


It seems that most of the time, when you read such warnings, it's beccause the concepters want to avoid usless complains ;)

In the case of XviD, "unstable" build give MUCH better results than "stable" one.

The same apply with Avisynth 2.5 (at least for me ) and plenty of others softwares.