wmansir
20th December 2002, 16:39
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=562&ncid=738&e=7&u=/ap/20021220/ap_on_hi_te/dvd_suit
They are countersuing 321 Studios, makers of DVD Copy Plus and DVD X Copy. Anyone know what the original suit is?
Oh, and this week's analogy is:
"It's like somebody selling a digital crowbar. It's like breaking into the castle if you will," said Patricia Benson, an attorney for the studios.
Actually, that's a good analogy, because it's perfectly legal to sell crowbars, at least the analog variety.
EDIT: Here's another source. It provides a little more insight into the case, and actually makes the same point about the crowbar analogy I made above.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=6842
They are countersuing 321 Studios, makers of DVD Copy Plus and DVD X Copy. Anyone know what the original suit is?
Oh, and this week's analogy is:
"It's like somebody selling a digital crowbar. It's like breaking into the castle if you will," said Patricia Benson, an attorney for the studios.
Actually, that's a good analogy, because it's perfectly legal to sell crowbars, at least the analog variety.
EDIT: Here's another source. It provides a little more insight into the case, and actually makes the same point about the crowbar analogy I made above.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=6842