Log in

View Full Version : Packed Bitstream


Sirber
24th November 2002, 17:53
Hi

Sould I use "Packed Bitstream" with 8 b-frames?

PhAtfiSh
24th November 2002, 18:02
if you read the tool tip is says that allows decoding without a delay, so i would say yes.

Sirber
24th November 2002, 18:05
Yeah but if you check the "exemple", there is juste 2 bf. I'm asking about 8 :p

PhAtfiSh
24th November 2002, 18:14
oh :)

well id still say yes, but thats just a guess :p

Sirber
24th November 2002, 18:40
I'll try it and feedback after.

I'm encoding right now "Army of Darkness", 2 audio track with:

QPEL
8 b-frames @ 150
DIVX Comp.
Packeted Bitstream
MAX P: 300
MIN P: 1

NoLogo
24th November 2002, 19:45
I would say no.

I've done many tests, using short parts of movies (Ghost Dog, Mulholland drive, about 3000-3500frames), to see the effect of "packed bitstream" and "div5 compatibility", because I had some jerky videos.

Here are the settings:
20-11-2002 (Koepi) or 20-11-2002 (Umaniac)
522kBs, MSP6, MPEG
Here are the results (quite the same for both builds):
BF-1-150/100: good quality (for the considerated bitrate), no dec problem
BF-1-150/100-DX5: same as above
BF-1-150/100-PB: quality little better, apparently no dec pb
BF-1-150/100-PB-DX5: same as above
Then:
BF-2-150/100: little improvements, no dec pb
BF-2-150/100-DX5: same as above
BF-2-150/100-PB: quality little better, jerky dec
BF-2-150/100-PB-DX5: same as above
Finally only tested w/ or w/o DX5 checked:
BF-3-150/100: better quality
BF-3-150/100-DX5: same as above
BF-3-200/150: improvements (higher average quant)
BF-3-200/150-DX5: same as above
I decoded my vids using either XviD.ax or FFDShow, w/o any PP: same results.

My conclusions:
DX5 cmpatibility: no quality or reading improvements.
Packed bitstream: the quality is better, but the movie is jerky, there must be a problem with it, at least on my computer.
Better setting for BF: 200/150-PB unchecked-DX5 unchecked.

FOr the developpers.
I did many other tests, and one was particularly surprising:
using Hinted ME made my video look terrible, I mean the quality was really awful, whereas without it, it's pretty correct.
I did nothing wrong, i used it without any recent improvements (BF, CM, GMC, QPEL), only HME.
Maybe ther's something wrong in the new builds, but I don't remember it was so nasty before (april or may builds looked much better with HME).
Other hand: QPel gives me some colorful artifacts, for example: color blue from a skirt that appears on a light pink skin (sometimes green, actually).

Anyway, XviD with BF really rocks, keep that way guys :)

Sirber
24th November 2002, 20:02
Packet Bitstream can't be played on ffdshow. Only XviD decode it correctly. My test with Army of darkness will be completed tomorow (1 or 2 "r"?).

I'll now (I mean we) if it's ok with audio delay or not.

nexus
24th November 2002, 21:13
@Sirber: 2 r's :-)

iago
25th November 2002, 00:31
@NoLogo and all,

Packed bitstream -> jerky playback here too! I thought it was only on my PC first! ;)

iago

NoLogo
25th November 2002, 00:46
@Iago:
Greeeeaaat !! I'm neither alone nor crazy :)
Yep, I have posted in the "XviD-14112002-1" thread, and nobody seemed to have that problem, therefore I thought it came from my computer.
But have a look there (Koepi's speaking):
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=38891
It's a little shame, because PB makes the average quant higher, but I prefer to have 25fps, and the quality is still pretty good. But maybe Muholland drive is a very compressible movie (actually, I bet it is :))

iago
25th November 2002, 00:53
@NoLogo

Did you try decoding "packed bitstream" encodes with ffdshow only, or with xvid.ax as well? (For me, the result is the same, but my system already doesn't like xvid.ax much! ;))

Btw, have you found a solution for Ghost Dog (640*352) to put it on 1CD? ;)

iago

NoLogo
25th November 2002, 02:08
@iago

Yes, I've tried both (no particular problem with xvid.ax on my system), but they give me jerky reading. My solutio is to give up PB for the moment.
About Ghost Dog, I had planned to do a 2Languages(French/English)-1CD Rip, that is to say:
french.ogg = 70MB
english.ogg = 73MB
video.avi = 556MB (Bitrate: 650kB/s)
french.srt = a few kB
When i see what I can get with BF-3-200/150 (with my test on Mulholland Drive at 520kB/s), I think I'll get it with Ghost Dog, even if it's sharper. And the resolution is 720x384 :D.
Actually, I already got it (nice quality with BF-2-150/0), but I kept PB checked... this means I lost 40 hours of work :(

See you

NoLogo

Sirber
25th November 2002, 04:12
It's done. I asked a 630000 kb movie but I recieved a 615234 kb. The quality is quite nice. Packeted Bitstream doesn't work now.

Don't try it. :scared: