mikecito
28th October 2002, 22:00
I openly admit to my ignorance on the topic...
I previously exported from Premiere to mpeg2 via CCE's plugin. I would use the 23.98 frame rate, and then pulldown to 29.97 in order to accept the stream into my dvd authoring program. Using this method, I had to stretch the audio afterward to make up for the difference in 23.98 and 23.976 frame rates.
I recently bought Premiere 6.5, and realized that it comes with an encoder for mpeg2, so I gave it a try. While I was at it, I tried to encode directly to 29.97 instead of 23.98 and then pulldown.
Here's where I'm confused: When I encode in premiere to 23.98, and then pulldown, I THINK I get the same result as if I just encode to 29.97 fps in the first place. If I encode directly to 29.97, I can skip the entire audio stretching process, which takes a couple hours. Am I missing something? Is there a reason I wouldn't want to do this?
Thanks in advance!
Mikecito
I previously exported from Premiere to mpeg2 via CCE's plugin. I would use the 23.98 frame rate, and then pulldown to 29.97 in order to accept the stream into my dvd authoring program. Using this method, I had to stretch the audio afterward to make up for the difference in 23.98 and 23.976 frame rates.
I recently bought Premiere 6.5, and realized that it comes with an encoder for mpeg2, so I gave it a try. While I was at it, I tried to encode directly to 29.97 instead of 23.98 and then pulldown.
Here's where I'm confused: When I encode in premiere to 23.98, and then pulldown, I THINK I get the same result as if I just encode to 29.97 fps in the first place. If I encode directly to 29.97, I can skip the entire audio stretching process, which takes a couple hours. Am I missing something? Is there a reason I wouldn't want to do this?
Thanks in advance!
Mikecito