View Full Version : who is Johnny Owl ^oo^ ?
DSPguru
19th October 2002, 14:32
seems like this guy uses BeSweet v1.4 in his tool (http://www.johnnyowl.com/adb), without asking for my permission, and ignoring all my distribution license :Distribution
------------
1 - You may not distribute BeSweet without having an explicit permission from me.
- Usually i would almost automaticly agree for developers to include BeSweet in their packages if the following exists :
2 -- The whole BeSweet package is included. (including all licensing textfiles)
3 -- BeSweet version is a release and not a beta.
4 -- The program is a freeware and not commercial in any mean.
5 -- There's an active link to my website, so that users can download the latest releases.
- Pay attention that i have my ways to test audio streams and find out if BeSweet was involved in their creation process. therefore, i would strongly advise you to simply contact me before using my work.
aleksander
20th October 2002, 01:54
It's probably Johnny Bravo....
You know.....
Think for a while of Johnny Bravo (especially his intelligence) and you will know what I think ;)
take care
DSPguru
20th October 2002, 19:46
and who is this bravo guy.. ?
aleksander
20th October 2002, 20:58
No...
Don't tell me that you have never seen Johnny Bravo on Cartoon Network.... !!!
If you haven't - just watch any episode.....
It's just a guy, who......
take care
DSPguru
25th October 2002, 07:41
summary :
adb (http://www.johnnyowl.com/adb/) by Jonny Owl (owl@johnnyowl.com) uses BeSweet.exe. violates 1,2,5.
SimpleDivx (http://members.lycos.nl/simpledivx/modules/news/article.php?item_id=13) by cyberdemonii (http://forum.doom9.org/private.php?s=&action=newmessage&userid=2190) uses BeSweet.dll. violates 1,2,5.
EasyVCD (http://members.eezi.net.au/~phatjeff/ri.html) by Rob Ferguson (dick_p_t@hotmail.com) uses BeSweet.exe. violates 1,5.
pacohaas
25th October 2002, 15:41
yeah, i'm sure the TMPG guys would be a bit disturbed to see that 3rd one as they don't even let doom9 distribute it.
grif_mcrenolds
22nd November 2002, 19:56
I say flame them with emails, and if they don't respnd, take legal action. BeSweet is an awesome program and it makes things so much easier in audio transcoding. All the time I see ads for "the easiest way to copy DVDs for only $xx" when it's only a bundle of VirtualDub and DivX Pro. But even they aren't charging anything, it's not polite to use another person's code without their permission.
Dark-Cracker
22nd November 2002, 20:22
@grif_mcrenolds
be cool, i don't think a legal action will be necessery, all the cited software (adb,simpledivx, easyvcd) are all freeware and made for helping people. and they don't use directely "another person's code" but use the besweet software. i think dspguru simply prefer use some clear rules (ask it permission to use his software), and don't wan't take a legal action :)
it's simply my opinion.
Ps: S**t my english sux !
grif_mcrenolds
22nd November 2002, 23:54
I guess I may have over reacted there. :) It's just that it ticks me off when people bundle other software and pass it off as their own, as we've seen in the 321Studios DVD copy app. However, Johny's tool did specify that it did use BeSweet, so maybe it's not such a big deal then. But I do think he should get DSPGuru's permission first. ;)
DSPguru
23rd November 2002, 13:03
i believe my terms are more than fair.
i've been working on BeSweet more than a year now, and have put thousands of hours in its development already.
BeSweet have made lot of things possible & also made already-possible tasks into much simpler, faster (&better quality) tasks.
now, look at my terms, don't you find them reasonable ?
put an active link to BeSweet's homepage : i hate to read bugreports of bugs that have already been resolved. that usually happens when users don't know of newer releases of BeSweet and don't upgrade.
include all licensing file in your package : BeSweet author, aka me, is very grateful to the lame developers, azid developer, etc'. including lame_enc.dll in your package without including LameLegal.txt is a total disrespect. same goes to BeSweet's readme.
'nuf said.
oh.. and thanks, grif, for your support!
Dark-Cracker
24th November 2002, 14:38
@dspguru
>i believe my terms are more than fair.
yes u are right :) i think asking your permission to distrubute your software is the correct attitude that all the people should do.
(hum my english sux)
>now, look at my terms, don't you find them reasonable ?
i have never said your terms was not reasonable, but as far as i am concerned i find the reaction of grif_mcrenolds a bit excessive.
(take a legal action).
i think if you writte the authors to remind them the term for using your tool they will do it , i think they respect your work because besweet is very usefull.but if i am wrong and they deliberately ignore your mail, take a legal action :)
>oh.. and thanks, grif, for your support!
everybody support u :)
perhaps have u misunderstand me, i simply find the reaction excessive, but i am for the respect of your software rules.
Best regards,
Bye.
PS: sorry for my bad english, i will kick my english teacher for this crap result :)
grif_mcrenolds
24th November 2002, 16:36
i have never said your terms was not reasonable, but as far as i am concerned i find the reaction of grif_mcrenolds a bit excessive.
(take a legal action).
What I meant was, take legal action if they don't respond. So far I don't know if they will or won't. I can just remember when people have taken this commuinty's work and passed it off as their own.
There's the 321Studio's DVD copying system, which they're charging money for, yet it's only SmartRipper and a few encoding apps. Have they given any credit to the original authors? From what I've heard they haven't. And there's also the infamous divxcrawler.com that stole Doom9's guides and entitiled them "The DivxCrawler Guides."
So what I mean is: take legal action if they refuse to cooperate. Thay may or they may not. We don't know yet.
Dark-Cracker
24th November 2002, 17:21
@grif_mcrenolds
i am totaly agree with u , stole software to make money was very nauseating (sorry i don't find another word in my poor english to describe my felling).
cofferscuffs
24th November 2002, 21:50
@ dsp
msg me on efnet if you want http://www.johnnyowl.com/ gone for good...
oh and anyone with sense knows that legal action based on internet stuff hardly works...
nameless1
10th January 2003, 03:08
is BeSweet a patented product?
dar1us
13th January 2003, 22:03
I think Owl's got crumbs on his lens:
http://www.johnnyowl.com/photos/Images/img_SAVE0006.JPG
Cheers for BeSweet, hours well worth it. Hope you enjoyed them:)
px3
1st February 2003, 20:01
Originally posted by DSPguru
seems like this guy uses BeSweet v1.4 in his tool (http://www.johnnyowl.com/adb), without asking for my permission, and ignoring all my distribution license :
Hi DSPguru,
under which license do you distribute besweet.dll ???
any permissions ?
if so, i would like to use it in mpeg2avi .. would this be ok for you ?
Regards,
Rolf
PX3
DSPguru
2nd February 2003, 06:45
hi px3,
BeSweet.dll is realeased under the same license as BeSweet.exe.
- You may not distribute BeSweet without having an explicit permission from me.
- Usually i would almost automaticly agree for developers to include BeSweet in their packages if the following exists :
-- The whole BeSweet package is included. (including all licensing textfiles)
-- BeSweet version is a release and not a beta.
-- The program is a freeware and not commercial in any mean.
-- There's an active link to my website, so that users can download the latest releases.i find the above license pretty fair & reasonable.
px3
2nd February 2003, 10:34
Originally posted by DSPguru
hi px3,
BeSweet.dll is realeased under the same license as BeSweet.exe.
i find the above license pretty fair & reasonable.
Hi dspguru,
that's ok for me, but how to i get this "explicit permission" ?
any idea ? =.-)
another problem:
besweet.dll is shipped with 4 files. 1 dll, 2 example files and one readme. imho that's the whole package i'd downloaded. do i need to distribute more files ?
Regards,
Rolf
PX3
DSPguru
2nd February 2003, 20:09
here's what you shuold include :
BeSweet.dll v1.4 + readme.txt
all the HELP folder from BeSweet v1.4
any optional plugin (shibatch.dll,lame_enc.dll,hip.dll,etc'..) and its license file.
permission ?
don't worry - you'll get it when all set.
int 21h
2nd February 2003, 20:21
PX3 is actively working on MPEG2AVI again!?!
px3
3rd February 2003, 17:23
Originally posted by int 21h
PX3 is actively working on MPEG2AVI again!?!
Yepp... i think i'll have a little bit more time this year to finish some code fragments i allready begun..
Regards,
Rolf
PX3
jonny
11th February 2003, 17:46
who is Johnny Owl ^oo^?
Johnny Owl's real name is Giovanni Giampieri
(http://www.johnnyowl.com/about/index.htm)
Some research with google:
He came from Monsampietro Morico, AP, Italy
(http://artists.iuma.com/IUMA/Bands/Johnny_Owl/)
Now the interesting part:
http://paginebianche.virgilio.it/index.html
If you fill Cognome o nome Azienda with Giampieri
and Dove with Monsampietro Morico
and press the CERCA >> button
The research popup 2 addresses + telephone numbers
You could try to telephone to him :D
(i fill like a detective :D:D:D)
dar1us
11th February 2003, 19:28
Enjoys: Jotting down pearls of wisdom
Hmm, like the address of BeSweet?
Come on, lets not kill him, but really, he should ask first.
jonny
11th February 2003, 20:55
My post was for fun, since i see some other posts are funny in this thread :).
I have maximun respect for DSPguru and for his license (i hope to don't get misunderstood for my post above).
Anyway, fun or not, you are really able to get his real home address and + real telephone number ("paginebianche" is an italian service, it's like a "directory of the telephone numbers" online)
Cheers
jonny
DSPguru
11th February 2003, 22:33
don't worry, no one is going to die.. :)
(unless you're name is 'saddam hussain'.. :o )
mpucoder
11th February 2003, 22:37
paginebianche = white pages, same as here.
dar1us
11th February 2003, 23:56
I know noone is gonna die. I hoped my post would be funny aswell. Nevermind.
@DSP, have you actually spoken to him about it all, I would be interested to hear what he has to say.
jonny
12th February 2003, 00:09
'saddam hussain'.. do you want me to find his telephone number? :D:D:D
(i promise, my last stupid message here... but i can't resist :))
EDIT: this was my 400th post :scared:
EDIT2: @dar1us: i respond here to your message below because i want to keep this magic number for at least one day :D
I'm not excited, i'm scared because i think my others 399 messages could be stupid as this one :rolleyes:
btw those are only numbers and surely your 174+1 posts are better.
dar1us
12th February 2003, 00:30
Congrats, and yeh, go ahead then:) Detective jonny
But, just u wait until you get to 1000 or 500 (then you will be real excited), I remember my first time, not on this forum mind, a school forum type thing. We wern't allowed chat, so we set up this little forum, worked quite well. But we are now allowed chat and everything.
This marks my 175th post on doom9, kinda a number, more definate than something like 163, or 183... Well, not as good as ures but DSP kick us all. Though some guys (think doom is) are at the 3000 mark n' beyond. Quite sad, but cool here:D
kelproit62
4th March 2003, 20:54
*spam and profanity deleted by the moderator*
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.