Marc FD
11th September 2002, 13:53
In fact, if i were you, i wouldn't use copysame 1.1 or 1.2 yet.
there is know bugs and the engine is not perfect.
i'm currently in R&D stage for CopySame v2.0
I've tested many algos for the engine and i'm coming to the solution.
a complex mix of differents search modes for each specific problematic case to reach 99.999% of accuracy.
In need to implement and test each search mode separatly (i've currently 1/3 ready)
Then i would merge the whole stuff, test and debug it a lot, and do a beta release.
It's going to take some time, so if you want to use CopySame, i would suggest you to :
- Use CopySame 1.2 !!! (neuron2 said it was much better than 1.1)
- Test and Tweak.
If the results are good for your stuff, you can use CopySame. I didn't say it was bad. I said it's going to be better.
Back to work :devil:
there is know bugs and the engine is not perfect.
i'm currently in R&D stage for CopySame v2.0
I've tested many algos for the engine and i'm coming to the solution.
a complex mix of differents search modes for each specific problematic case to reach 99.999% of accuracy.
In need to implement and test each search mode separatly (i've currently 1/3 ready)
Then i would merge the whole stuff, test and debug it a lot, and do a beta release.
It's going to take some time, so if you want to use CopySame, i would suggest you to :
- Use CopySame 1.2 !!! (neuron2 said it was much better than 1.1)
- Test and Tweak.
If the results are good for your stuff, you can use CopySame. I didn't say it was bad. I said it's going to be better.
Back to work :devil: