Log in

View Full Version : is this what slows me down


jojo136
9th August 2002, 22:59
i think that my hd is slowing me down when i encode

it is a seagate 80 gb 5400 rpm

i think i will bye a hd whit 7200 rpm and what is the best solution

to put my os on the 7200 rpm disk

and use my 5400 rpm disk for the target disk



or
my os on the 5400 rpm disk and the 7200 rpm for the output from cce

cpu 1.8 p4
768 mb sdram
encode speed 0.9
os xp home
please advise

thnx

mb1
10th August 2002, 00:33
You don't need a 7200 hd.

But it is true that encoding from and to the same hd is slower than encoding from one hd to another.

I have two 5400 hd in my system and I can capture fully with huffyuv f.e. and so on.
So no need for a hd which spins faster. It only will be louder and hotter.

The only advantage of a 7200 hd could be (needn't to be) faster access time on multiple smallest files.

p3distxii
10th August 2002, 07:10
Originally posted by mb1
You don't need a 7200 hd.

I must disagree. Having a 7200 hd improves your overall PC performance in so many ways. Startup is faster, programs start faster, and everything that uses your HD runs about 1/3 faster. Encoding? well, I never encoded on a 5400 hd so I have nothing to compare it to.

Also...

Western Digital just released a "special edition" version of it's hd's that feature an 8 mb buffer. I don't know how much this would really help, but if you're springing for a new one, you may want to try it out (you could always return it if you aren't satisfied!).

auenf
10th August 2002, 12:04
i have a WD1000JB (7200 rpm 8mb cache) and it does help alot in normal use (i get to work and wonder what the hell is wrong with it its that slow)

BUT, when encoding, especially to MPEG-2, the hdd speed isnt going to make that much difference mainly cause the cpu will be the limit at the moment.

most 7200rpm drives can transfer over 33mbytes/sec these days, which if you were to work out how much video that translates to be:

using UNCOMPRESSED PAL or NTSC D-1 with 48khz/16-bit/Stereo that is less than 30mbytes/sec, which i think almost noone is using uncompressed as source, DV is 3.6mbytes/sec, and so getting a faster drive will only help cause it doesnt have to seek to the part for the reading, then seek to the part to write, but apart from that, if you need more hdd space, by all means get a 7200, as mentioned before, it helps in overall system speed, capturing and if you want and have the money get the 8mb WD, they are very nice.

Enf...

jojo136
10th August 2002, 15:36
ok thnx for the info

my procesor is constant 100% in use when i encode is this means i cant get any faster

auenf
10th August 2002, 15:54
i see your using a P4 with SDRAM, which is the slowest P4 platform.

the P4 is built for high memory bandwith, which might be your speed problem (i get ~.9 in CCE with my ~900 Duron w/DDR SDRAM)

Enf...

jojo136
10th August 2002, 16:03
can i switch between memory ???

or is dat depending of the moederboard

thnx

the specs of my pc http://www.medion.de/test/computer_bild/bericht_011119.html

auenf
11th August 2002, 05:25
switching memory will be dependant on the motherboard, which basically means you'll have to swap motherboard, which will mean a reinstall) or repair install of XP if you do, so at the moment id sit tight if i were you. (unless that 1800 of yours is a 1.8A, then i would try running it at 533fsb and see what happens)

Enf...

p3distxii
11th August 2002, 06:39
Originally posted by auenf
...which will mean a reinstall or repair install of XP if you do,
Enf...

That's not true. I have xp and when I installed my new mobo (asus kv7333)I didn't have to adjust anything. I just booted up and it was found.

jojo136
11th August 2002, 09:59
Originally posted by auenf
(unless that 1800 of yours is a 1.8A, then i would try running it at 533fsb and see what happens)

Enf...

iám sorry but i don't under stand it what you mean whit 1.8a

regards marco

auenf
12th August 2002, 13:04
newer P4 processors with a new core and more L2 cache (512) start at 2ghz, but intel released a 1.6 and 1.8 version of it two, which will overclock to 533fsb easily.

obviously if you were confused by my previous post, then you most probably dont have one, to confirm it grab a copy of wcpuid (www.h-oda.com) and save a bmp of the first screen.

Enf...

jojo136
12th August 2002, 16:34
damm 256 kb cache memory

auenf
13th August 2002, 12:39
not all that much to worry about, another poor guy was getting a lot lower than you with his 1800+ axp, but he was running it at 1300+ speeds ;)

Enf...

jojo136
13th August 2002, 15:30
will i get more speed when take a p4 procesor with 512 kb
in the same system ????

Arky
13th August 2002, 23:48
Originally posted by auenf
i have a WD1000JB (7200 rpm 8mb cache) and it does help alot in normal use (i get to work and wonder what the hell is wrong with it its that slow)

BUT, when encoding, especially to MPEG-2, the hdd speed isnt going to make that much difference mainly cause the cpu will be the limit at the moment.

most 7200rpm drives can transfer over 33mbytes/sec these days, which if you were to work out how much video that translates to be:

using UNCOMPRESSED PAL or NTSC D-1 with 48khz/16-bit/Stereo that is less than 30mbytes/sec, which i think almost noone is using uncompressed as source, DV is 3.6mbytes/sec, and so getting a faster drive will only help cause it doesnt have to seek to the part for the reading, then seek to the part to write, but apart from that, if you need more hdd space, by all means get a 7200, as mentioned before, it helps in overall system speed, capturing and if you want and have the money get the 8mb WD, they are very nice.

Enf...

I too have an 8mb cache 80gb Western Digital (7200rpm), and it is very nice. I also run two 80gb IBMs (2mb cache; 7200rpm) and I must say there is very little to choose between them in terms of performance. The W-D is quieter than the IBMs, but then that's no big deal. I can wholeheartedly recommend either of these drives, since they perform beautifully and are excellent quality. The 80gb IBMs are particularly good value on w*w.eBuyer.com at the moment (I got my W-D from eBuyer, but it cost me more than the IBMs). It is unbelievable that you can get IBM quality at LESS than £1 per gig at the moment! :)

120Gb IBM:

http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/products/index.html?action=c2hvd19wcm9kdWN0X292ZXJ2aWV3&product_uid=31006

80Gb IBM:

http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/products/index.html?action=c2hvd19wcm9kdWN0X292ZXJ2aWV3&product_uid=30616


Arky ;o)

jojo136
12th December 2002, 23:07
okej i have a upgrade

new systeem is a p4 2.5 ghz
256 ddr 333 mhz

and i got a speed with cce 2.5 from 1.3

owjeahh my cpu is now one that runs on a 400 mhz bus next week i change him with one that runs on a 533 bus wil my speed goes up or not ??

jojo136
13th December 2002, 23:01
ok new update

p4 2.8 ghz
256 ddr 333 mhz

speed with cce 1.53

will more ddr ram helps ?? i want 2.0 :):)

i use dvd2avi
avisynth
cce