Log in

View Full Version : Settings on Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos DivX 5.02 Trailer


werky
26th May 2002, 00:34
Is there a way to find the settings used in the compression of this trailer?

A method or anyone who works at divxnetworks and could tell us the settings used. :sly:

The trailer is very well encoded and what surprises me more is that it's using b-frames, so i'm surprised i can't see any macroblock in it. Although i'm decoding movies with the post-processing on level zero, i still don't enjoying the blur effect that this does to the movie.

I know it has been encoded with b-frames, because, i can play divx 5 movies without pro features, only with divx 4.12 decoder.

Fox Mulder
26th May 2002, 09:43
And what about GMC? 4.12 still decodes with this feature used?

kvs
26th May 2002, 14:27
Without having seen the trailer, it was very likely encoded from a high-quality error-free digital copy.. something you can't exactly say about the dvd-sources we usually use for ripping purposes.

DJ Bobo
26th May 2002, 15:08
Yes, it is 100% digital computer generated source (with many black title sequences & low motion scenes, which frees bitrate for the few action scenes of the trailer), that's why it looks so good.

thekid
29th May 2002, 01:58
from Gej (who encoded the file)

"This clip is a two pass encode with Q pel, GMC, B frames, crop/resize in the codec, PreProcessing set to "normal" and Psychovisuals enhancements set to "strong".

The "motion blur" effect is part of the original; it's added during rendering by the 3D software in order to have a more 'natural' look.

We told you that 5.0 features add a lot quality !"

thekid...

werky
2nd June 2002, 17:54
I've done the test with StarTrek - Motion Picture.

And sincerely i don't see any improvements in QUALITY using all these features extra than b-frames and GMC. All i've got is a short filesize.:rolleyes:

TEST:

Neutral Resize with Gknot, 2-pass at 590 kbit/s
for 640*270 for 1 cd.

a) Crop/resize in avisynth and only with b-frames and GMC i got file of = 568 Mb

b) Crop/resize in the codec with the b-frames, GMC and plus: Q pel, PreProcessing set to "normal" and Psychovisuals enhancements set to "strong" = 545 Mb


It seems that this way of encoding could be good to make the shorter filesize possible. But in quality you couldn't see any improvement in quality, i thinks it could be a little worse than the traditional way.

I've to admit that this trailer got all this quality just because Gej encoded it from a master source. :p

By the way anyone here tested to make an encoding from a DVD SUPERBIT. I've seen the screenchots and the picture is really improved it these dvds. Maybe we could get an improved rip
:sly:

neo_sapien
2nd June 2002, 20:53
Why on earth would he set preprocessing to normal? It's a digital source; it's not like there's any film grain that needs to be filtered out.

hippoth
10th June 2002, 10:23
can it be that the warcraft trailer are encoded with divx 4???
all analyzer i tried to use say it is an divx 4 encoding :confused:

evilhomer
11th June 2002, 01:34
gmc, b-frames, q-pel, pycho, resize in codec

that sound like divx4 to you?

hippoth
11th June 2002, 08:56
Originally posted by evilhomer
gmc, b-frames, q-pel, pycho, resize in codec

that sound like divx4 to you?

no it doesnīt :rolleyes:

but can it be that the people here do a mistake and speak about the wrong codec? :sly:

evilhomer
12th June 2002, 16:52
probably he just used an analyzer that came out before divx5?

hippoth
12th June 2002, 20:59
no I didnīt :rolleyes: