View Full Version : new name for 'MCF-CD'
avih
25th April 2002, 09:56
Please follow this thread (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=23743)
and vote.
what's your favourite?
Koepi
25th April 2002, 10:21
Hm, is that really all you want to offer as votes?
How about:
- MF II-CD (MFCD)
Mode/form 2 cd, maybe you remember those old PC keyboard architecture from the 80s? ;)
- Extended Video CD (EVCD)
Self explanatory
- Use All CD (UACD)
- HugeCD (HCD)
and so on? ;)
Best regards,
Koepi
avih
25th April 2002, 10:28
koepi: i can't modify the poll. you're a moderator, maybe u can :)
you're welcome to add any other name as well.
just do it now before too many ppl will vote. ;)
avi
ChristianHJW
25th April 2002, 10:51
done ;)
I voted for MCF-CD ( of course ) but i agree there should be a general name for other purposes. EVCD is quite nice, but as it may contain all sorts of data as i understand it, not only video, its maybe not the right name ?
Probably 'More-CD' is not the worst of all ....
DeXT
25th April 2002, 21:08
What about "XCD" (Extended CD/Extra CD)? It's very short and reflects an extended format.
I personally don't like much the "MoreCD" name but seems this is the preferred one. EVCD seems a bit confusing (since we already have XVCD, CVCD... people will think it's another VCD variant for standalone players, and currently it's not), and as I said MCF-CD is not suitable because it's a different format.
ChristianHJW
25th April 2002, 21:23
Originally posted by DeXT
[B]What about "XCD" (Extra CD)? It's very short and reflects an extended format. .. added. In fact, i like it.
FDISK
26th April 2002, 00:33
I REALLY like Extended CD. It sounds cool, XCD is easy to say, and I think it will catch on. Go with that:)
spyder
26th April 2002, 00:49
XCD also goes nicely with XviD and DivX.
wing1
26th April 2002, 01:04
How about adding another choice? U-AVD as in Universal AudioVideo Disc? Since it allows all formats to be written to the CD instead of just the mpeg1/mpeg1 layerII format.
Gawen
26th April 2002, 01:51
xcd.org is already blocked by some kind of domain grabber. Like almost all 3 letter domain names. ( http://xcd.org )
avih
26th April 2002, 02:04
we don't need a domain name.
i also like XCD a lot. catchy name. but i already voted...
Neo Neko
26th April 2002, 02:18
XCD fer me. It can reside with the rest of the MCF tools on their page so there is no need for it's own site. have you looked at X-CD.org? dashes are allowed aren't they?
robUx4
26th April 2002, 09:41
Extended CD is too close to Extra CD which already exists...
Otherwise I also think More CD is a nice name.
DeXT
26th April 2002, 10:54
Well in fact it's not "Extra CD", but "CD Extra", the name of the existing format. It's a multisession disc with audio tracks in the first one and a data track in the second.
Seems we have two winners, MoreCD and XCD. It's fun because XCD has been on the list less than 24h :)
robUx4
26th April 2002, 12:33
Well for me it would be MoreCD, because it will be referred as MCD which can also work for MCF-CD.
Anyway that's just a convention. I guess the official spec will retain the name MCF-CD.
avih
26th April 2002, 13:16
"I guess the official spec will retain the name MCF-CD."
i really hope it won't. but it's still to be discussed ;)
robUx4
26th April 2002, 14:26
IEEE1394 is called IEEE1394 in the spec...
Otherwise you call it Firewire, iLink or SB1394...
Where is the pb ?
robUx4
26th April 2002, 14:31
BTW, xcd.com and xcd.org already exists...
morecd.org and morecd.com don't.
avih
26th April 2002, 17:53
"IEEE1394 is called IEEE1394 in the spec...
Otherwise you call it Firewire, iLink or SB1394... "
IEEE is a known and respectable institution. i won't mind this cd format called IEEExyzw.
with all due respect, mcf has not yet gained the popularity of IEEE with regard to standards :)
Doom9
26th April 2002, 20:02
is the domain so important? I didn't start my site with having a domain name.. we could always go for something like extended-cd.com. I find it much more important that people can identify with the format thru its name.
unplugged
26th April 2002, 21:14
excuse my intrusion :o
Plain-CD : directly borrowed from the manner of data distribution, with virtually no *redundance*.
It's also sounds very clear... Don't think? :rolleyes::D
Stream-CD
...
CDROM-XD (for data, instead CDROM-XA...)
...
If it's previsional a file-sytem inside (would be good, with some CRC just for F.A.T. ... oh, ooo... I'm going too far) could be called CDRawFS instead of CDFS.
XCD is good, right sense and pretty linuxian :D.
(having to do with cheap CD-ROM units maybe a Pain-CD... :D:devil: )
ammer
27th April 2002, 10:55
Big-CDXA2-MFC-CD
twistee
28th April 2002, 10:22
I like XCD, as its kinda like XVCD and XSVCD, as its not really a 'standard' way of doing things but you get more quality out of it....
Neo Neko
28th April 2002, 19:31
Looks like XCD is the winner. It alone has more votes than almost all the other choices combined!!!
MaTTeR
30th April 2002, 16:41
Any conclusion yet? Looks like XCD is smoking the others still.
BTW- The pol graph is funky looking on Mozilla:(
robUx4
30th April 2002, 22:01
Originally posted by MaTTeR
BTW- The pol graph is funky looking on Mozilla:(
No probs with Netscape 6.2.2
unplugged
1st May 2002, 12:00
Nor with Mozilla 1.0RC1 ;)
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.