Log in

View Full Version : After a very succesful DivX 5.0 Encoding...


Snollygoster
5th March 2002, 20:01
Hello you DivX addicted friends who I am sure that you have not been sleeping since the release of the codec!

I encoded my PAL Fight Club DVD with DivX 5.0 using:

SmartRipper
DVD2Avi
Gordian Knot
AviSynth
VirtualDub

# I have not cropped and resized into the codec. I did that in GKnot.
# I have used the exact same bitrate as in DivX 4.0
# I have not used deinterlace or IVTC as the source was PAL.
# I HAVE used QuarterPixel, GMC, Bidirectional Encoding
# We are talking about 2 passes of course.
# I have not used Psychovisual Enhancements and Pre Processing as the first one is still buggy and I did not have a noisy source.

What did I get?

# The BEST quality ever seen in DivX. I have used XVid, DivX 3.11 SBC, DivX 4.0 and FairUse. NOTHING AS GOOD AS DivX 5.0 so far using 2 CDS and AC3 sound @ 384 kbps (same movie always).

# No artifacts. AT ALL.

# The avi file (with AC3) produced can be played in every player and the quality does not change if I use the DivX Player Alpha 2.0.

@ If you try to convert the file from AVI to MP4 after multiplexing the AC3 it will not be done and you will get an error message.

@ If you convert just the AVI without sound you will get a file with same quality, 2 MB smaller. (I do not see the point doing this)

@ If you try producing the MP4 file from the encoding in VirtualDub you will get a crash. So DO NOT. First make the AVI file and then convert to MP4 (the convertion took 2 minutes for a 1 GB file).

This is it. Rate the codec. Do your test and PLEASE make a DivX 5.0 Calculator!

PS: One more thing noticed is that while I search through the movie (you know, moving the slider) I get to the wanted part immediately. No image skip, nothing. Is like navigating in a 3 MB AVI file.


I hope I helped you out there!

FactorM
5th March 2002, 20:08
how much is the difference in filesize compared to the one gknot gives you?

Snollygoster
5th March 2002, 20:13
GKnot gave me 1009 MB. I got 1026 MB...

dado023
5th March 2002, 21:04
to be sure with wich version did you test it pro or regular
i can see it is pro(b-frames...) but you didnt clarify that :)

PS: One more thing noticed is that while I search through the movie (you know, moving the slider) I get to the wanted part immediately. No image skip, nothing. Is like navigating in a 3 MB AVI file.
yes i noticed it too but with divx4 encoded movies
i gues seeking is somehow improved -instant seeking-

dragoman
5th March 2002, 21:07
Hi,

My experience with DivX 5 shows better seeking also.

However, the video seems to seek better now than the audio, so you might want to try tighter interleaving settings when muxing audio in Nandub...

Just a tip...

dragoman

But agreed, seeking is much better with b-frames!!!

Sephiros
5th March 2002, 21:45
Where is the b-frame setting in the configuration panel of Divx5-pro?

FactorM
5th March 2002, 21:55
@Sephiros:

activate 'use bidirectional encoding'