Log in

View Full Version : Why this happened??


MoonWalker
28th February 2002, 23:06
Look at this sreenshot? Why is that??

http://www.geocities.com/aleksikerayno/1.jpg

Thanks,
MoonWalker

anecd0te
11th March 2002, 00:53
"We're sorry, but this page is currently unavailable for viewing."

Try moving the pic to another site, so we can see/ diagnose your problem :D

MoonWalker
11th March 2002, 22:56
But I can see it...Hmm well.. It's a scene from Blade Runner totaly filed with blocks...

http://www.geocities.com/aleksikerayno/1.zip

Here is in zip...And I also tried to attched it...

MoonWalker

breathtaker
12th March 2002, 05:36
copy and paste the url . i have the same problem but with viewing files from cds i get the samething but when i copy it to my hdd its still like your picture

gooki
17th March 2002, 05:53
from the looks of things it appears that you have a bad/corrupted keyframe in your movie.

Slogra
17th March 2002, 22:33
I don't think anyone know what causes these errors.

Not too long ago, I encoded a movie at a real low bitrate and it was full or these kind of errors. So maybe it's causes by a too low bitrate...

btw. the picture works when you remove http:// from the url.

gooki
18th March 2002, 01:17
from memory if you use fast re-compress (nandub) without any anti shit you can get bad frames. Also i had experienced bad frames through using flaskmpeg as well - reason - not sure - was a long time ago.

destarded
10th July 2002, 12:20
so anti-shit is worth the extra time?
I mean, better safe than sorry, right?

diji1
10th July 2002, 14:12
gooki : from memory if you use fast re-compress (nandub) without any anti shit you can get bad frames.

i don't necessarily think that's a given ...

destarded : so anti-shit is worth the extra time? I mean, better safe than sorry, right?

sometimes ;). sometimes it can increase filesize, meaning u have to tune the settings to try and remove any shit and keep in ur target filesize. i personally don't use that feature unless i encounter bad artifacts or "shit" on viewing the video then ill re-encode with it turned on, others have it on as a "default" setting. i think that prolly both methods have their drawbacks - i end up re-encoding and others end up using it where there really was no need for it ... just depends what we happen to be encoding and other settings/filters.

Pen-Pen
2nd January 2003, 17:57
Originally posted by gooki
from memory if you use fast re-compress (nandub) without any anti shit you can get bad frames. Also i had experienced bad frames through using flaskmpeg as well - reason - not sure - was a long time ago.

for antishit to work, you need to set nandub in full processing mode, you know ^^

AuK59
21st January 2003, 22:01
out of curiosity, what are your system specs?