BDHDLIGHT
25th July 2026, 14:25
Hello
Is there a universal rc-lookahead ?
By universal, I mean that we can put on all films without thinking that our rc-lookahead is not high enough or unnecessarily too large.
I know that the maximum of the rc-lookahead is 250.
I see several different rc lookahead encodings on them.
I saw rc-lookahead lower than 60 when the encoders use presets lower than the one I usually use, which is veryslow.
For example, I saw rc-lookahead at 64, 80, 120, 200, and many other different rc-lookahead when looking at several encodings.
I also noticed that some encoders themselves use different rc-lookahead during their encoding, hence my question about the fact of a variation depending on the movies.
I donÂ’t see why the same encoders would sometimes use a number and sometimes another number during their encoding, so use the same one if it has no impact.
ShouldnÂ’t the rc-lookahead be the same for all movies?
Are there any particular cases of films where the rc-lookahead must be higher?
I will probably be told about the default rc-lookahead for x264, which is 60 in veryslow and placebo.
The default value for x264 merange is 24 in very slow and placebo, and I know that if I change it to 64, I gain quality even though I know it will be minimal during my encoding.
Of course, my encoding will be longer, but I gain quality and security by expanding the search area up to 64 pixels.
All this to say that I canÂ’t rely on the default setting of x264 if IÂ’m looking for possible gains, even minimal ones.
Good weekend.
Is there a universal rc-lookahead ?
By universal, I mean that we can put on all films without thinking that our rc-lookahead is not high enough or unnecessarily too large.
I know that the maximum of the rc-lookahead is 250.
I see several different rc lookahead encodings on them.
I saw rc-lookahead lower than 60 when the encoders use presets lower than the one I usually use, which is veryslow.
For example, I saw rc-lookahead at 64, 80, 120, 200, and many other different rc-lookahead when looking at several encodings.
I also noticed that some encoders themselves use different rc-lookahead during their encoding, hence my question about the fact of a variation depending on the movies.
I donÂ’t see why the same encoders would sometimes use a number and sometimes another number during their encoding, so use the same one if it has no impact.
ShouldnÂ’t the rc-lookahead be the same for all movies?
Are there any particular cases of films where the rc-lookahead must be higher?
I will probably be told about the default rc-lookahead for x264, which is 60 in veryslow and placebo.
The default value for x264 merange is 24 in very slow and placebo, and I know that if I change it to 64, I gain quality even though I know it will be minimal during my encoding.
Of course, my encoding will be longer, but I gain quality and security by expanding the search area up to 64 pixels.
All this to say that I canÂ’t rely on the default setting of x264 if IÂ’m looking for possible gains, even minimal ones.
Good weekend.