manuel
14th June 2026, 16:48
Hi everyone,
I am designing a custom quantization matrix for low-bitrate MPEG-2 encoding, analyzed through the mathematical binary convergence to absolute zero (using 255 as the target numerator).
For my INTRA matrix, I built a perfect diagonal shell structure using Even Hybrids to maximize stability and prevent flickering.
Now, for the INTER matrix, I am experimenting with a strict "Linear Local Variation" constraint. My goal is to reach a maximum 2x (+100%) compression step in the last high-frequency cell.
To achieve a perfectly smooth rampa, I am distributing the compression load proportionally across the 63 steps using a fixed cell-to-cell increment formula:
(100 - 0) / 63 = ~1.5873% for each local variation step based on the worst-case scenario of integer quotients.
What are your thoughts on using this constant percentage progression for smoothing out motion vectors in HCEnc?
Thanks,
Manuel
I am designing a custom quantization matrix for low-bitrate MPEG-2 encoding, analyzed through the mathematical binary convergence to absolute zero (using 255 as the target numerator).
For my INTRA matrix, I built a perfect diagonal shell structure using Even Hybrids to maximize stability and prevent flickering.
Now, for the INTER matrix, I am experimenting with a strict "Linear Local Variation" constraint. My goal is to reach a maximum 2x (+100%) compression step in the last high-frequency cell.
To achieve a perfectly smooth rampa, I am distributing the compression load proportionally across the 63 steps using a fixed cell-to-cell increment formula:
(100 - 0) / 63 = ~1.5873% for each local variation step based on the worst-case scenario of integer quotients.
What are your thoughts on using this constant percentage progression for smoothing out motion vectors in HCEnc?
Thanks,
Manuel