VoodooFX
15th February 2025, 21:18
Looks like CrystalDiskMark and alike - AS SSD Benchmark, ATTO Disk Benchmark, AmorphousDiskMark, KDiskMark are worthless crapware.
I noticed that Kingston sata SSD is slooow [it's new, no problems in SMART], so out of curiosity I decided to benchmark it vs Toshiba SSD [both are from the same category] which I know that it has expected performance.
CrystalDiskMark results showed that Kingston is a bit faster, similar results from the other mentioned apps too. :D
Only PassMark's PerformanceTest was able to show ~proper results, Kingston resulted in 2.1 times lower "Disk Mark" score, I expected it to be ~3-5 times lower, because in my personal tests it was twice slower in read/write operations + 10-100 times slower in latency.
I noticed that Kingston sata SSD is slooow [it's new, no problems in SMART], so out of curiosity I decided to benchmark it vs Toshiba SSD [both are from the same category] which I know that it has expected performance.
CrystalDiskMark results showed that Kingston is a bit faster, similar results from the other mentioned apps too. :D
Only PassMark's PerformanceTest was able to show ~proper results, Kingston resulted in 2.1 times lower "Disk Mark" score, I expected it to be ~3-5 times lower, because in my personal tests it was twice slower in read/write operations + 10-100 times slower in latency.