orion44
21st April 2023, 12:01
Throughout the years, I always read on video forums how Yadif is a very good deinterlacer,
and people were recommending it to users who didn't want to use QTGMC.
After downloading and trying Yadif v1.7 a couple of times in the past, I didn't know what all the fuss was about,
because it produced a slightly 'plastic' look that I didn't like. So I stopped using it.
Couple of days ago, out of curiosity, I downloaded Yadif v0.9 from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080112060959/http://avisynth.org.ru/yadif/yadif.html
Wow, what a difference this version makes! It produced an excellent deinterlaced video without any traces of that 'plastic' look.
It has now become my preferred deinterlacer for same frame rate deinterlacing (Yadif(mode=0, order=1)).
Anyway, just wanted to post this if any of the users are having the same problem with Yadif that I had.
If you don't like the look that Yadif produces, don't use versions of Yadif created after 2007. Instead, use the version 0.9 from 2007.
and people were recommending it to users who didn't want to use QTGMC.
After downloading and trying Yadif v1.7 a couple of times in the past, I didn't know what all the fuss was about,
because it produced a slightly 'plastic' look that I didn't like. So I stopped using it.
Couple of days ago, out of curiosity, I downloaded Yadif v0.9 from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080112060959/http://avisynth.org.ru/yadif/yadif.html
Wow, what a difference this version makes! It produced an excellent deinterlaced video without any traces of that 'plastic' look.
It has now become my preferred deinterlacer for same frame rate deinterlacing (Yadif(mode=0, order=1)).
Anyway, just wanted to post this if any of the users are having the same problem with Yadif that I had.
If you don't like the look that Yadif produces, don't use versions of Yadif created after 2007. Instead, use the version 0.9 from 2007.