View Full Version : AMD & Intel optimised dlls and exes?
Synth
25th February 2002, 00:07
Just thought it would be a good idea to collect links to all the specially optimised dlls and exes available dealing with audio and video encoding.
Please post.
Koepi
25th February 2002, 00:09
Please DON'T!
Stop it.
This is getting real work now. Stop it. Nobody wants unqualified posts.
Don't make me remove your posts....
Regards,
Koepi
Synth
25th February 2002, 01:14
unqualified post?
sorry!
i thought i had a good idea :confused:
Koepi
25th February 2002, 08:28
No, bad idea:
the dll uses optimized code for mmx, sse etc.
So there was some testing with using an intel compiler, but that seems to be a dead end and didn't work as expected.
Did you look at the "CPU tab" at least once? The optimizations you are looking for are already there.
Regards,
Koepi
Synth
26th February 2002, 04:04
Actually I was referring to stuff like optimised lame dlls, azid, ssrc, etc.
Not sure if this would be the best forum section to post this in though.
Maybe Doom could have a section specially for optimised stuff.
Just a thought anyway.
NeVeRLiFt
26th February 2002, 05:06
Ya we dont want XVID ending up like DivX4.xx :( all buggy and unstable!!! :angry: And I dont wanna hear no shit about this. Me and my friends have tested and the damn codec has issues. Dont flame me goto there forum and post for help and they tell you to try a beta build.... Hmmmmmm you let DivX5 have these same problems and I will post in every forum I goto about it! Aint no reason to have a buggy codec!!!
NeVeRLiFt
26th February 2002, 05:11
On a side note!
No other codec I have used has ever caused my computer to lock up or fragging restart on its own! I thought it was just my AMD cpu but I have friends with Intel CPU's and they have problems to. :rolleyes:
Foo
26th February 2002, 05:53
Originally posted by NeVeRLiFt
Ya we dont want XVID ending up like DivX4.xx :( all buggy and unstable!!! :angry: And I dont wanna hear no shit about this. Me and my friends have tested and the damn codec has issues.
And yet countless THOUSANDS of others use it daily without any problems, with Intel and AMD chips...hmm ;) .
foo
NeVeRLiFt
26th February 2002, 05:57
Ya and I'm happy for them. To bad they dont know how to use Nandub or Fairuse ;)
Better yet... I like it when they tell you to use a older version say like 4.02 :rolleyes: the codec is still beta IMHO and I look forward to DivX5.
MaTTeR
26th February 2002, 06:36
@NeVeRLiFt
Your obiously right, the codec does have issues but I would refer to them as quality issues(ie.blurry/soft & macroblocks).
However, I for one am not looking at Divx 5. What I look for is a daily build of Xvid ATM;)
Stabmaster-Arson
26th February 2002, 06:41
I too, am most looking forward to Xvid. GNU GPL Babeeeeeeeeee!
NeVeRLiFt
26th February 2002, 07:03
Originally posted by MaTTeR
@NeVeRLiFt
Your obiously right, the codec does have issues but I would refer to them as quality issues(ie.blurry/soft & macroblocks).
However, I for one am not looking at Divx 5. What I look for is a daily build of Xvid ATM;)
ditto!
I have no stability problems with XVID ;) and it works damn good for encoding and for video capture.
kopelen
26th February 2002, 08:04
XVID?!?? You guys are crazy! VCD rules and always will. VCD is king!
MaTTeR
26th February 2002, 08:22
Originally posted by kopelen
XVID?!?? You guys are crazy! VCD rules and always will.
Pretty bold statement seeing as this is your first post;) Please point out to me one VCD that is superior in quality over a nice 2ps Xvid or SBC. I'm actually curious because maybe I'm missing out on one of the finer things in life:D
Captain_Nipple
26th February 2002, 16:22
Ya, maybe the newbie is right. VCD better then XviD?? ;)
kopelen, your a bit of a sausage. If you make a statement like that, u goota have some evidence to back it up. If you do, well by all means fire away:rolleyes:
Captain:devil:
NeVeRLiFt
26th February 2002, 17:04
LOL
I have made some nice looking VCD's with TMPGEnc... but they do not look as good as my DivX made by using Nandub or Fairuse! I to would love to try your settings or template that give you this wonderful VCD.
Captain_Nipple
26th February 2002, 17:31
I think you will find quicktime (.mov) a far better codec.
Quicktime rules. Quicktime is king my friend!! I have evidence of this;)
Captain:devil:
MaTTeR
26th February 2002, 17:32
Originally posted by Captain_Nipple
Quicktime is king my friend!! I have evidence of this;)
I wouldn't expect anything less than this from Apple:)
Captain_Nipple
26th February 2002, 18:05
Anybody get a chance to test On2's new VP5 codec??
Someone was telling me about it and said it was the dogs
bollocks(e.g good), which i find hard to believe. I can't view these files here in work due to bloody proxy. Anyway, there is no encoder just yet so how can one judge this new codec without making there own encodes I don't know. :confused:
I think XviD is fine for the mo.
Captain:devil:
kopelen
27th February 2002, 06:33
Heh, just wanted to hear what people would say to that post. No I have no backup and sorry for being 'a bit of a sausage.' I am one for diVx and Xvid seems to be the next BIG thing.
Go Xvid!
<...brainwarshed by NeVeRLiFt...>
Foo
27th February 2002, 08:10
Originally posted by NeVeRLiFt
LOL
I have made some nice looking VCD's with TMPGEnc... but they do not look as good as my DivX made by using Nandub or Fairuse! I to would love to try your settings or template that give you this wonderful VCD.
Sorry to bring up the past Neverlift, but you're the one who claimed that if you wanted to use two discs, you would "make a kick ass VCD" and not use DivX. You also went on about how VCD yielded better quality than SVCD, and how the size/quality ratio for SVCD was horrible, even though the size vs. time constraints for both are similar. I won't even bring up what you said about needing a DVD-R...;).
foo
Captain_Nipple
27th February 2002, 10:25
Just having a bit of fun kopelen. Have to do it once in a while in these forums. Happy posting!
Captain:devil:
NeVeRLiFt
27th February 2002, 20:32
Originally posted by Foo
Sorry to bring up the past Neverlift, but you're the one who claimed that if you wanted to use two discs, you would "make a kick ass VCD" and not use DivX. You also went on about how VCD yielded better quality than SVCD, and how the size/quality ratio for SVCD was horrible, even though the size vs. time constraints for both are similar. I won't even bring up what you said about needing a DVD-R...;).
foo
LOL thats true friend and I still only make 1cd DivX movies.
When using Fairuse or Nandub even movies over 2hrs long can still fit to 1cd and look good. But of course you know this dont you ;)
Maybe with Hardware decoders and DVD units supporting Mpeg4, and me buying a DVDRW....... things will change :p
Size want matter as much and be it DivX/Mpeg4 movies or SVCD's they will all look good.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.