need suggestions for my vaporsynth wrapper

[feisty2]

I need suggestions for https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=181027

1. Do you think I should merge all vxx files into one header file?
2. Do you think if I should come up with a more "proper" name than vsfilterscript, since it has gone far beyond scripting simple filters and now covers pretty much the full functionality of the vaporsynth C API?

[ChaosKing]

How about vsfilter++ :D
Or something like easyVSfilter...

[StainlessS]

Is 'vs' necessary in the name, ie as just easyFilter rather than easyVSFilter.
Or maybe richFilter, or rapidFilter [as in RAD], or speedyFilter, or leanFilter, comfyFilter, lushFilter, tastyFilter, robustFilter, fertileFilter, fulsomeFilter, artfulFilter, feistyFilter.

[feisty2]

I like vs++/vsxx but the name has been taken by another low level wrapper, maybe one of the following?
1) vs+++/vsxxx
2) modern vs++/vsxx
3) vs++/vsxx 2.0
4) vs++/vsxx 2a (the name will be updated along with future c++ standards).

[ChaosKing]

I like modern vs++ and vsxx/vs++ 2.0. Another alternative: vs2++