TSM2UHD Discussion and Bug Reporting

[A.Fenderson]

OK, thanks for the replies.

I ordered the LG UP870, as it's the cheapest standalone I could find (just over $100 USD here) and a different brand from either LowDead's or jdobbs' machines.

Yeah, I obviously don't know what I'm doing when reencoding, so I'm going to have to put some work into it. I had skimmed through that whitepaper and not even made a mental note of the allowable framerates.

I did find out that I can pass the uhd-bd flag to x265 via Handbrake in the "extra options" field, but I then also realized that 8-bit color is not UHD-BD compatible either:

x265 [error]: uhd-bd: bit depth, chroma subsample, source picture type must be 10, 4:2:0, progressive
So obviously I have lots more research to do to get up to speed on this. If anyone has links for noobs to try to learn x265 CLI and/or downloadable and copyright-free non-HDR 10-bit UHD video clips, that would be appreciated too.

[LowDead]

@jdobbs: Have you tried a 1:1 copy of a movie that fits a bd-50? I have done a couple, and what strikes me is that they play flawlessly. For instance mediainfo report Maximum Overall bit rate: 109 Mb/s for Rise of the planet of the apes. As I don't have bitrate display on the Samsung I have to rely on software.

//LD

[jdobbs]

@jdobbs: Have you tried a 1:1 copy of a movie that fits a bd-50? I have done a couple, and what strikes me is that they play flawlessly. For instance mediainfo report Maximum Overall bit rate: 109 Mb/s for Rise of the planet of the apes. As I don't have bitrate display on the Samsung I have to rely on software.

//LDI have and it doesn't work for me. The bitrate is too high and the playback stutters. I'm guessing the only reason it is working is because you are using a software player. 109Mbs is the maximum bitrate for a BD-100, not a BD-50.

[LowDead]

I have and it doesn't work for me. The bitrate is too high and the playback stutters. I'm guessing the only reason it is working is because you are using a software player. 109Mbs is the maximum bitrate for a BD-100, not a BD-50.

Sorry for not being clear. It works flawlessly on my samsung standalone. Maybe it has a good amount of memory for caching? I have no idea, but it works. I checked the bitrate on my pc.

//LD

[jdobbs]

Sorry for not being clear. It works flawlessly on my samsung standalone. Maybe it has a good amount of memory for caching? I have no idea, but it works. I checked the bitrate on my pc.

//LDMy guess is that you got lucky. I'm assuming that the maximum bitrate increases due to spin speed of the disc. It sounds like your player spins at 4x even with a BD-50.

[ocean]

Tested Rise of the planet of the apes mastered on BD-RE 50GB, with XBOX One X and Samsung UBD-K8500, fluid vision without stuttering, m2ts main 35 GiB, peak bitrate 64 Mb/s, average bitrate 40-45 Mb/s.

[jdobbs]

Tested Rise of the planet of the apes mastered on BD-RE 50GB, with XBOX One X and Samsung UBD-K8500, fluid vision without stuttering, m2ts main 35 GiB, peak bitrate 64 Mb/s, average bitrate 40-45 Mb/s.Thanks for posting.

Just out of curiosity... what command line did you use for reencoding?

[wolflop]

Ive send you samples 3 weeks ago. Did you find something out jdobbs?

[LowDead]

@jdobbs: Would it be possible for you to squeeze in x264 m2ts support also? Have some I wanna test with.

//LD

[jdobbs]

@jdobbs: Would it be possible for you to squeeze in x264 m2ts support also? Have some I wanna test with.

//LDI don't understand what you are asking for?

[LowDead]

To have it accept a x264 encoded stream, but maybe that isn't in UHD specs. I don't know.

//LD

[A.Fenderson]

To have it accept a x264 encoded stream, but maybe that isn't in UHD specs. I don't know.

//LD

It is, but only at 1920x1080 @ either 23.976 or 24.0 fps, 40 Mbps max, High or Main, L 4.1 or 4.0. See page 14 of this white paper(.pdf). (http://www.blu-raydisc.com/assets/Downloadablefile/BD-ROM_Part3_V3.0_WhitePaper_150724.pdf)

[MB2]

I've had success but most of the time, before I can even get it into a folder format, TSMuxer gives me this error:

Reading buffer overflow. Possible container streams are not syncronized. Please, verify stream fps. File name: H:\Batman v Superman Dawn Of Justice (2016) (UHD) (BD100)\BDMV\STREAM\00000.m2ts

Any ideas, suggestions or settings? All I am doing is dropping in the m2ts and creating Blu-ray folder.



The film "Hidden Figures" loses it's HDR for some reason too after running through TSm2UHD

[LowDead]

I've had success but most of the time, before I can even get it into a folder format, TSMuxer gives me this error:

Reading buffer overflow. Possible container streams are not syncronized. Please, verify stream fps. File name: H:\Batman v Superman Dawn Of Justice (2016) (UHD) (BD100)\BDMV\STREAM\00000.m2ts

Any ideas, suggestions or settings? All I am doing is dropping in the m2ts and creating Blu-ray folder.



The film "Hidden Figures" loses it's HDR for some reason too after running through TSm2UHD

Try demuxing the audio and then use the demuxed file as source in tsMuxer.

The reason it looses the HDR is discussed earlier in this thread.

//LD

[jdobbs]

I've found that sometimes an odd PGS can cause that error. Try demuxing the video and audio separately... then try each subtitle until you find the one that is the problem.

[A.Fenderson]

I ripped (via MakeMKV) then demuxed and remuxed (both via tsMuxeR) the main movie file of my copy of BladeRunner 2049. I did not reencode video or audio, as I wanted to make sure all streams were 100% UHD-BD compliant (though I did cut out a couple of foreign language audio tracks). The resulting BD structure was 81 GB, so I burned to a new Sony BD-RE XL 100GB disc using my new Asus BW-16D1HT at the rated maximum of 2x burn speed.

The resulting disc was not recognized as UHD-BD at all in either my LG UP870 UHD-BD player, nor my Xbox One S.

I then ran TSM2UHD on the remux from above, and reburned as above: same results on both players.

I don't have UHD-BD playback ability on my PC, as the requirements are insane, but reading from the same drive that burned it, I can play back the main-movie m2ts file, for what that's worth.

To do further testing, especially on the disc itself, I remuxed a very brief pre-movie m2ts file from a different UHD-BD title, burned it to the same BD-RE XL 100GB disc, and attempted to play it back: raw tsMuxeR output failed to be recognized by either player, as did the TSM2UHD-processed files burned later.

Realizing that the above may point to nothing other than the possibility that (my) UHD-BD players do not play nice with BD-RE XL 100GB discs, I reburned the final TSM2UHD-processed files to a BD-RE DL 50GB disc: it did play on both players, though with stuttering. This was ripped from a 66GB UHD-BD, and the Xbox showed spikes of 100 Mbps, so that is not surprising.

Anyway, I don't yet have any (non rewriteable) BD-R XL 100GB discs to test with, those these may (hopefully will) be readable in my players (and all players generally). I am unaware of any UHD-BDs that have been pressed to 50GB discs, and I am still unsure of how to get 100% UHD-BD compliance when reencoding video, so for now I'm at an impasse as regards contributing to testing.

If anyone is aware of any available UHD-BD releases on 50 GB discs, please let me know.

[MB2]

Hi,

BD50 UHD's

Alien Covenant
Hidden Figures
Boss Baby, The
Captain Underpants - The First Epic Movie
Despicable Me 1 and 2
Lego Batman Movie
Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes
Prometheus
Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)
Underworld 5 - Blood Wars
Dark Tower, The
Emoji Movie, The
Fantastic 4 (2015)
Hitman - Agent 47
Keeping Up With The Joneses
Lego Movie, The
Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates
Peanuts Movie, The
Rough Night
Trolls
Wild
Lego Ninjago Movie, The
Morgan
Sausage Party



Also, BD-RE XL do not work in my Oppo 203 either. BD-R XL do. I sent them some test copies and they updated their firmware.

:)

[A.Fenderson]

I spot-checked a few of those titles against the blu-ray.com and highdefdigest.com listings, and all were stated to be 66GB discs. Where did see them stated to be 50 GB discs?

I did order a 5-pack of BD-R XL 100 GB discs for testing.

[MB2]

I have all those, and they all fit on BD50, untouched with menus etc

Not sure if they actually were on a BD66 as such, but file size is defo under 50gb

:)

[jdobbs]

I ripped (via MakeMKV) then demuxed and remuxed (both via tsMuxeR) the main movie file of my copy of BladeRunner 2049. I did not reencode video or audio, as I wanted to make sure all streams were 100% UHD-BD compliant (though I did cut out a couple of foreign language audio tracks). The resulting BD structure was 81 GB, so I burned to a new Sony BD-RE XL 100GB disc using my new Asus BW-16D1HT at the rated maximum of 2x burn speed.

The resulting disc was not recognized as UHD-BD at all in either my LG UP870 UHD-BD player, nor my Xbox One S.

I then ran TSM2UHD on the remux from above, and reburned as above: same results on both players.

I don't have UHD-BD playback ability on my PC, as the requirements are insane, but reading from the same drive that burned it, I can play back the main-movie m2ts file, for what that's worth.

To do further testing, especially on the disc itself, I remuxed a very brief pre-movie m2ts file from a different UHD-BD title, burned it to the same BD-RE XL 100GB disc, and attempted to play it back: raw tsMuxeR output failed to be recognized by either player, as did the TSM2UHD-processed files burned later.

Realizing that the above may point to nothing other than the possibility that (my) UHD-BD players do not play nice with BD-RE XL 100GB discs, I reburned the final TSM2UHD-processed files to a BD-RE DL 50GB disc: it did play on both players, though with stuttering. This was ripped from a 66GB UHD-BD, and the Xbox showed spikes of 100 Mbps, so that is not surprising.

Anyway, I don't yet have any (non rewriteable) BD-R XL 100GB discs to test with, those these may (hopefully will) be readable in my players (and all players generally). I am unaware of any UHD-BDs that have been pressed to 50GB discs, and I am still unsure of how to get 100% UHD-BD compliance when reencoding video, so for now I'm at an impasse as regards contributing to testing.

If anyone is aware of any available UHD-BD releases on 50 GB discs, please let me know.I also have a BD-XL burner... and could never get my UHD-BD player to recognize it. There's something different in the format, I just don't know what it is. The stuttering is almost certainly caused by the excessive bitrate of the original. As I've said before, I have yet to find anything other than a few extras that would play back properly without reencoding due to bitrate.

[geheim]

As I've said before, I have yet to find anything other than a few extras that would play back properly without reencoding due to bitrate.

I've remuxed Rise of the Planet of the Apes with DVDFab on BD50. No reencoding was done and playback works just fine on my x800. Perhaps you could try that movie for testing purposes.

[jdobbs]

I've remuxed Rise of the Planet of the Apes with DVDFab on BD50. No reencoding was done and playback works just fine on my x800. Perhaps you could try that movie for testing purposes.Interesting...

[A.Fenderson]

Isn't it possible though, that the encode or overall stream bitrate exceeds UHD50 specs, but that particular player is able to spin the disc higher than spec in an attempt to keep up?

[jdobbs]

Isn't it possible though, that the encode or overall stream bitrate exceeds UHD50 specs, but that particular player is able to spin the disc higher than spec in an attempt to keep up?Except... it is the same player I have, and none of the ones I've tried worked.

@geheim

Did DVDFab mux in an ATMOS track with it?

[A.Fenderson]

Except... it is the same player I have, and none of the ones I've tried worked.

Gotcha. Well, be it known that the title in question is part of Amazon's 4K UHD Value Promotion (https://www.amazon.com/b?node=17360628011), meaning it can be had for $16.66 if you're willing to buy two other titles on the list at the same time. Please note all the fine-print at the bottom of the page, however, and also know that you can only use the offer once per account: I've placed one order and attempted a second, but no discount, and when I chatted customer service they quoted me invisible rules that amount to "one offer per customer" though it's not stated on the page.

[rtosco]

Did you find out something with the samples I sent you (No Picture on UB 900)?

wolflop

Same player, same result... No picture, only audio on the Panasonic UB900. It seems we're out of luck.
Thanks for your work jdobbs though!

Roberto

[jdobbs]

Anyone:

I've found another extension related to UHD-BD. It is in the index.bdmv file and is identified by ID1=3, ID2=1. Does anyone have any idea what this extension contains?

As for the extension found in the MPLS file, I thought I'd share that after dumping it out and some investigating, it contains the HDR information for the playlist. It is represented by ID1=3, ID2=5 and holds the HDR specifics including: G, B, R and white point (WP) x/y pairs in units of 0.00002. The Luma (L) min (in units of .0001) and max (as a whole number), the maximum content light level (MaxCLL) and the maximum frame average light level (MaxFALL).

The G,B,R,WP information has been consistent with Display P3 in every example I've seen (where HDR is present).

[jdobbs]

To have it accept a x264 encoded stream, but maybe that isn't in UHD specs. I don't know.

//LDImporting it into a pseudo-BD is fine... but if it is UHD it will have to be reencoded to HEVC before attempting to burn to a BD.

[ocean]

Anyone:

I've found another extension related to UHD-BD. It is in the index.bdmv file and is identified by ID1=3, ID2=1. Does anyone have any idea what this extension contains?


Thanks for information, file index.bdmv "Extension data":

"ExtensionData": [
{
"ID1": 3,
"ID2": 1,
"data_block": [
0,
0,
0,
8,
81,
0,
2,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
http://i63.tinypic.com/213234g.png

[jdobbs]

I have some good news. The extension (see the reply above from ocean) to the index.bdmv has fixed some issues.

The comments I'd made earlier about always having to reencode because of bitrates doesn't seem to apply now. I've taken several original streams and muxed them directly without reencoding and they appear to work fine when burned to a BD-50 (both RE and R). The cause of the stuttering was apparently caused by the lack of the index.bdmv extension providing the player some needed information.

My thanks to ocean and geheim for helping close another gap on the backup capability of UHD-BD.

I'll release a new version of TSM2UHD with this and a couple other fixes in day or two.

[jdobbs]

I've updated the first post of this thread with a new release of TSM2UHD.

Changes:

- Added MEDIAINFO to the release (zip file) for collection of UHD and HDR information
Note: The version of MediaInfo.exe included with TSM2UHD must
be present in the same folder as TSM2UHD.EXE in order for it to execute.
- Now adds necessary extensions to MPLS and index.bdmv files. This assures greater compliance.
- Several minor changes and updates.
- With this version you may often be able to keep original files intact (when they fit on a BD-50).

[spexman]

All your excellent work and expertise is much appreciated....thanks!

[jdobbs]

I've had success but most of the time, before I can even get it into a folder format, TSMuxer gives me this error:

Reading buffer overflow. Possible container streams are not syncronized. Please, verify stream fps. File name: H:\Batman v Superman Dawn Of Justice (2016) (UHD) (BD100)\BDMV\STREAM\00000.m2ts

Any ideas, suggestions or settings? All I am doing is dropping in the m2ts and creating Blu-ray folder.



The film "Hidden Figures" loses it's HDR for some reason too after running through TSm2UHDJust an additional note on this. Most of the time if you demux the video first, and then demux the audio/subtitles you can get past this error (that's what BD Rebuilder does when it runs into it). Then just remux by combining all the components in TSMUXER. If you have access to the MPLS in a source BD structure, you can also open that with TSMUXER -- and cut and paste the chapter times from the Blu-Ray tab into the same place in the new mux.

[wolflop]

Still the same problem as I already described. Movie burned on a BDXL 100 Rewriteable, played with UB900. No picture, sound is working properly

mediainfo after TM2Uhd 1.1

Allgemein
ID : 1 (0x1)
Vollständiger Name : E:\Datensicherung\UHDRips\AlienCov\BDMV\STREAM\00000.m2ts
Format : BDAV
Format/Info : Blu-ray Video
Dateigröße : 32,0 GiB
Dauer : 2 h 2 min
Modus der Gesamtbitrate : variabel
Gesamte Bitrate : 37,5 Mb/s
maximale Gesamtbitrate : 35,5 Mb/s

Video
ID : 4113 (0x1011)
Menü-ID : 1 (0x1)
Format : HEVC
Format/Info : High Efficiency Video Coding
Format-Profil : Main 10@L5.1@High
Codec-ID : 36
Dauer : 2 h 2 min
Bitrate : 35,3 Mb/s
Breite : 3 840 Pixel
Höhe : 2 160 Pixel
Bildseitenverhältnis : 16:9
Bildwiederholungsrate : 23,976 (24000/1001) FPS
ColorSpace : YUV
ChromaSubsampling/String : 4:2:0 (Type 2)
BitDepth/String : 10 bits
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.177
Stream-Größe : 30,1 GiB (94%)
verwendete Encoder-Bibliothek : ATEME Titan File 3.8.3 (4.8.3.0)
colour_range : Limited
colour_primaries : BT.2020
transfer_characteristics : PQ
matrix_coefficients : BT.2020 non-constant
MasteringDisplay_ColorPrimaries : R: x=0.680000 y=0.320000, G: x=0.265000 y=0.690000, B: x=0.150000 y=0.060000, White point: x=0.312700 y=0.329000
MasteringDisplay_Luminance : min: 0.0050 cd/m2, max: 1000.0000 cd/m2

Audio
ID : 4352 (0x1100)
Menü-ID : 1 (0x1)
Format : DTS
Format/Info : Digital Theater Systems
Format_Settings_Mode : 16
Format-Einstellungen für Endianess : Big
Codec-ID : 130
Dauer : 2 h 2 min
Bitraten-Modus : konstant
Bitrate : 768 kb/s
Kanäle : 6 Kanäle
Kanal-Positionen : Front: L C R, Side: L R, LFE
Samplingrate : 48,0 kHz
Bildwiederholungsrate : 93,750 FPS (512 SPF)
BitDepth/String : 24 bits
Stream-Größe : 670 MiB (2%)

Text #1
ID : 4608 (0x1200)
Menü-ID : 1 (0x1)
Format : PGS
Codec-ID : 144

Text #2
ID : 4609 (0x1201)
Menü-ID : 1 (0x1)
Format : PGS
Codec-ID : 144
Dauer : 2 h 1 min
Video Verzögerung : 3s 86 ms

[A.Fenderson]

Still the same problem as I already described. Movie burned on a BDXL 100 Rewriteable, played with UB900. No picture, sound is working properly

Unfortunately, as with the early-ish days of Blu-ray, it seems as though playback of consumer writable and rewritable media at the native format capacity (100 GB here) is not a requirement for players to meet the UHD-BD standard. From what I've seen, it's starting to look as though most players will likely support BD-R/RE 25 GB and 50 GB discs, but very few will support BDXL R/RE 100 GB discs. If the remuxed stream will fit on a BD-R/RE 50 GB disc, have you tried that?

[geheim]

Thanks for the new version, jdobbs.
Unfortunately it still doesn't work like expected on my x800. HDR is not recognized, seems there are still some flags missing. Audio is not sync with video, there is a difference of quite a few minutes at the end of the movie. And the video itself plays better than before, but there are still some occasional stutterings.

Hopefully you can figure out what is still missing. If I can help with some additional testing feel free to ask. Thanks for working on this!

[no-one]

Thanks for the new version, jdobbs.
Unfortunately it still doesn't work like expected on my x800. HDR is not recognized, seems there are still some flags missing. Audio is not sync with video, there is a difference of quite a few minutes at the end of the movie. And the video itself plays better than before, but there are still some occasional stutterings.

Hopefully you can figure out what is still missing. If I can help with some additional testing feel free to ask. Thanks for working on this!

Same problem.

And After process tsmuxer, every movie duration is set = 01:53:45:443 in mpls file

[wolflop]

The Ub900 supports 100 GB of Xl BDR discs. If I burn complete untouched discs, they will work fine.

[jdobbs]

Standard BD-XL discs are not formatted in the same way as a UHD BD-100. It just isn't reasonable to expect them to work. For them to do so would be the exception rather than the rule.

[rtosco]

Standard BD-XL discs are not formatted in the same way as a UHD BD-100. It just isn't reasonable to expect them to work. For them to do so would be the exception rather than the rule.

Hi jdobbs, I don't think the video problem on the UB900 is related to BD-100, I'm using BD-RE 50 and still have no picture even with 1.11 program version. The player does not trigger HDR on the TV and only sound is (correctly) played. Maybe something is still missing and/or the Panasonic player is more adherent to UHD specs than other players.
Thanks for keeping improving your piece of SW!

[jdobbs]

Thanks for the new version, jdobbs.
Unfortunately it still doesn't work like expected on my x800. HDR is not recognized, seems there are still some flags missing. Audio is not sync with video, there is a difference of quite a few minutes at the end of the movie. And the video itself plays better than before, but there are still some occasional stutterings.

Hopefully you can figure out what is still missing. If I can help with some additional testing feel free to ask. Thanks for working on this!Well... I have the same player and I am getting no sync issues, no stuttering, etc. What process are you using to create it?

[jdobbs]

Hi jdobbs, I don't think the video problem on the UB900 is related to BD-100, I'm using BD-RE 50 and still have no picture even with 1.11 program version. The player does not trigger HDR on the TV and only sound is (correctly) played. Maybe something is still missing and/or the Panasonic player is more adherent to UHD specs than other players.
Thanks for keeping improving your piece of SW!Can you send me a zip containing everything on the disc except the M2TS file?

[geheim]

Well... I have the same player and I am getting no sync issues, no stuttering, etc. What process are you using to create it?

This time I tested with an MKV file from Inferno with german audio - processed with TSMuxer, using BluRay folder output mode. Then I used TSM2UHD 1.11 on that folder.
The resulting disc folder didn't play at all on Windows using DVDFab Media Player, but I burnt to a Sony BD-RE 50GB to test on my x800 and got the issues described above...

[A.Fenderson]

movie: Argo UHD (66 GB dual layer disc).
ripped via MakeMKV 1.10.10.
demuxed via tsMuxeR 2.6.11.
reumuxed main (only) video (HEVC 4K), DTS core English audio, & 2 English PGS streams via tsMuxer 2.6.11.
burned & verified with ImgBurn 2.5.8.0 to Verbatim BD-R (not -RE) 50 GB disc via Asus BW-16D1HTv3.00
attempted playback in LG UP870: recognized as Blu-ray disc, but playback immediately fails to main system menu.
attempted playback in Xbox One S: playback semi-successful with audio but no video. Xbox bitrate scanner showed as high as ~130 Mbps, which is max allowable bitrate on HTR zone of 66 & 100 GB UHD-BD discs. However, it also reported the stream as 1080p.

ran TSM2UHD v1.11 on above-referenced remux: success with no errors reported.
burned & verified with ImgBurn 2.5.8.0 to Verbatim BD-R (not -RE) 50 GB disc via Asus BW-16D1HTv3.00
attempted playback in LG UP870: playback attempted, audio fine, video displays decode errors every two seconds or more often, largely as bright monochrome blocks throughout the picture.
I noticed there was a pending firmware upgrade for the player, so applied that, but no change in playback results.
attempted playback in Xbox One S: playback is largely OK, with no audio issues and only occasional slight stuttering of the video, but result is actually arguably watchable, just not perfect.

I'm guessing from this test that the Xbox One S may have the ability to spin BD50s at speeds high enough to ensure smooth(ish) playback of videos encoded somewhere above the max bitrate the spec calls for regarding BD50s, but that the LG UP870 isn't quite as successful.

For what it's worth, I'm now burning to BD-RE XL 100 GB, but I don't anticipate that working at all, as neither of my players previously worked with this disc type.

---
edit: neither player will recognize the BD-RE XL 100 GB burn (verified via ImgBurn) of Argo.

[jdobbs]

Thanks for the new version, jdobbs.
Unfortunately it still doesn't work like expected on my x800. HDR is not recognized, seems there are still some flags missing. Audio is not sync with video, there is a difference of quite a few minutes at the end of the movie. And the video itself plays better than before, but there are still some occasional stutterings.

Hopefully you can figure out what is still missing. If I can help with some additional testing feel free to ask. Thanks for working on this!Well... I have the same player and I am getting no sync issues, no stuttering, etc. What process are you using to create it?I stand corrected. I just ran a disc and got the same results you posted. I'd done this disc before... I'm now looking to see what has changed.

[jdobbs]

This time I tested with an MKV file from Inferno with german audio - processed with TSMuxer, using BluRay folder output mode. Then I used TSM2UHD 1.11 on that folder.
The resulting disc folder didn't play at all on Windows using DVDFab Media Player, but I burnt to a Sony BD-RE 50GB to test on my x800 and got the issues described above...I'm not sure about all the details around your post... but it is rare that the video in an MKV is compliant.

[geheim]

I'm not sure about all the details around your post... but it is rare that the video in an MKV is compliant.

It was a remux from an original UHD - so the video inside the MKV was compliant as it was an original hevc stream.

[rtosco]

Can you send me a zip containing everything on the disc except the M2TS file?

I would gladly do, but I can't find your e-mail address I should send the files to. And I'm not able to send private messages either...

Could you please send me a pm?
Thanks,
Roberto

[jdobbs]

I would gladly do, but I can't find your e-mail address I should send the files to. And I'm not able to send private messages either...

Could you please send me a pm?
Thanks,
Roberto I sent you a pm. You can also find the address under HELP in BD Rebuilder.

[ocean]

Thanks for the great work, the mpls file now contains data extensions HDR, something is missing in the clpi file for HDR activation, replacing the original clpi file in the structure created with TSM2UHD, works HDR.

File clpi original:

"ProgramInfo": {
"reserved_for_word_align": 0,
"program_sequence": [
{
"SPN_program_sequence_start": 0,
"program_map_PID": 256,
"reserved01": 0,
"stream_in_ps": [
{
"stream_PID": 4113,
"stream_coding_type": "H.265",
"video_format": "2160p",
"frame_rate": "23.976",
"aspect_ratio": "16:9",
"reserved01": 0,
"cc_flag": 0,
"reserved02": 4608,
"ISRC": {
"country_code": "",
"copyright_holder": "",
"recording_year": "",
"recording_number": ""
},
"reserved03": 0


File clpi after use TSMuxer and TSM2UHD:

"ProgramInfo": {
"reserved_for_word_align": 0,
"program_sequence": [
{
"SPN_program_sequence_start": 0,
"program_map_PID": 256,
"reserved01": 0,
"stream_in_ps": [
{
"stream_PID": 4113,
"stream_coding_type": "H.265",
"video_format": "2160p",
"frame_rate": "23.976",
"aspect_ratio": "16:9",
"reserved01": 0,
"cc_flag": 0,
"reserved02": 0,
"ISRC": {
"country_code": "00",
"copyright_holder": "000",
"recording_year": "00",
"recording_number": "00000"
},
"reserved03": 0