Log in

View Full Version : videorecording xavc s and then reencode?


fenomeno83
28th November 2016, 00:46
Hi. I don't know if i'm in the right section, but i've a question.

I've buyed a sony handycam hdr cx 405.

This camera has the followings best record settings:
-AVCHD 1080p 60fps 28Mbps
-XAVC S 1080p 60fps 50Mbps

So i'd like keep the best capture quality and then reencode to save space keeping very good quality.

So, i thoght to record in XAVC S and than reencode using handbrake with 18 crf and high profile.

Or is better capture videos directly with lower bitrate(using AVCHD) and don't reencode?

What do you suggest?
Thanks

fenomeno83
28th November 2016, 20:23
Any help?
Thanks

sneaker_ger
28th November 2016, 20:52
I'd record XAVC S and later re-encode on the PC (of course archiving highest quality without re-encoding would be preferable). Encoding on the PC using HandBrake/x264 will likely be better than the real-time AVC encoder embed into the camera.

But: why don't you just test it?

fenomeno83
28th November 2016, 21:57
Thanks sneaker..yes,i will test but i'd like know your suggestions too.

Just another thing:
To keep 60fps what avc high profile can I use? 4.0 is good?
Thanks

sneaker_ger
28th November 2016, 21:58
1080p60 requires level 4.2 or higher.

fenomeno83
28th November 2016, 22:00
Ok thanks.
Will be no differences between 4.2 and 5.0?

sneaker_ger
28th November 2016, 22:15
Probably neglible for your use case.

In detail:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264/MPEG-4_AVC#Levels
More bitrate and bigger DPB.

fenomeno83
28th November 2016, 22:41
Thanks

dipje
29th November 2016, 13:37
speaking from experience having sony gear with AVCHD, their encoder isn't the best at distribution of the bits, and I find myself sometimes wishing it had more bitrate at 1080p25 @ 24mbps, even more so with the 1080p50 @ 27 / 28 mbps I have on my camera.

So for sure record in the highest possible, the onboard encoder isn't at good ( at all ) as x264. If you re-encode for archival with crf 18 you'll be safe.

If you want to edit the stuff, better to edit it in XAVC-S and encode/archive the final result. You may never know what information is lost (that you don't really see) when re-encoding.
That being said, for home-movie stuff I can't imagine it being a problem.

fenomeno83
29th November 2016, 22:08
Thankssss!!!