Plum, blind deconvolution enhanced by pixel/block matching

[feisty2]

yes, I knew what you were saying, but it's better to be clear about intended usage or applicable scenarios (maybe in the documentation or readme). You're going to save yourself some headaches when someone doing a quick search , or doing some quick tests , asks questions or how come so and so doesn't work . And you will save users the headache of having to test the slow filter on stuff it wasn't meant to be used on

okay, please tell me an alternative word/phrase for "real life genuine photos + fancy CGs like that wormhole and blackhole in the interstellar movie that look real enough to fool your eyes", and a word/phrase for "images that are not in the aforementioned category"

[poisondeathray]

okay, please tell me an alternative word/phrase for "real life genuine photos + fancy CGs like that wormhole and blackhole in the interstellar movie that look real enough to fool your eyes", and a word/phrase for "images that are not in the aforementioned category"

You can word it however you like - you're the author. And you don't have to do anything if you don't want to . I'm not going to fly to LA and twist your arm :D

I'm just suggesting it's better to be clear and concise.

When you write something like "vectorization is the ultimate answer to all CG graphics out there" , or "photographic materials are just, more "fragile" in every single way than CG graphics" - it's just plain wrong. I know what you meant to say - but you're going to confuse some people

And there's a continuum - it doesn't have to be ultra-realistic-indistinguishable-from-real-life-photos, even semi-realistic CG renders can benefit from this filter or similar approaches

But the category it's defintely not suitable for is "simple cartoons" . That's probably not a good descriptive term but you can work on it. Even your "cheesy basic CG" term is more precise wording than "all CG"

[lansing]

I want to try this out on my bluray but it crashed on load