View Full Version : SACD-ISO or FLAC
czgirb
12th November 2015, 07:08
Sometimes, when I want to DL something, which allowed me to choose between:
* PS3 Rip, SACD-ISO, DSD64 2.0, 1-bit/2.8224 MHz
* FLAC (converted w/ foobar2000 to tracks) 24bit/88,2 kHz
Generally, due to my listening is device is a Computer and iPod, to DL FLAC should be enough for me, right?
If I burned the SACD-ISO,
* is it able to be burned? How? ... I'm using Ubuntu.
* after it was burned, is it able to played in conventional CD player? or just in SACD player?
microchip8
12th November 2015, 13:46
Please read the rules. We don't offer support for downloaded stuff
pandy
23rd November 2015, 13:45
Sometimes, when I want to DL something, which allowed me to choose between:
* PS3 Rip, SACD-ISO, DSD64 2.0, 1-bit/2.8224 MHz
* FLAC (converted w/ foobar2000 to tracks) 24bit/88,2 kHz
Generally, due to my listening is device is a Computer and iPod, to DL FLAC should be enough for me, right?
If I burned the SACD-ISO,
* is it able to be burned? How? ... I'm using Ubuntu.
* after it was burned, is it able to played in conventional CD player? or just in SACD player?
SACD is lossy format where PCM is lossless format.
Different topic is where SACD is only one source available - then i see no difference in terms of quality between those two (as SACD need to be converted in a lossy way to lossless PCM) - PCM can be used to create subformats where SACD need to be always converted first to PCM.
foxyshadis
3rd December 2015, 01:43
I have a hard time considering anything "lossy" at that point; while it has to be transformed to be played through regular audio channels, so does 44.1kHz need to be transformed to the 48kHz base output rate, and the loss of each is pretty equivalent. (Far below any hearing threshold.) Especially if the work was originally mastered in DSD and then transformed to PCM for the alternative download, which isn't exactly common, but not rare either.
Ghitulescu
3rd December 2015, 09:38
Generally, due to my listening is device is a Computer and iPod, to DL FLAC should be enough for me, right?
MP3 would be enough, hi res music makes no sense.
pandy
4th December 2015, 21:10
MP3 would be enough, hi res music makes no sense.
"640K ought to be enough for anybody"
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Bill_Gates#640_k.2F1_MB
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.