rudyb
5th March 2015, 06:33
Hi,
The default size of CTU in HM model is 64x64.
I was wondering what is the advantage of having a CTU 64x64 vs a CTU of 32x32?
Because to me the maximum transfer size is TU 32x32, then what is the point of having a CTU of 64x64?
The only advantage that I can think of, if maybe all the four CUs inside a CTU have the same motion vectors, then we can save some bits in encoding the motion vector.
Even I don't see a much advantage if we use use the "bypass" mode, where we bypass the TU.
I have a feeling that deciding on a CTU size of 64x64 must have more pronounced advantages over having a CTU size of 32x32, that I may be overlooking !
Can someone tell me the real advantages of having a CTU size of 64x64 vs 32x32 ?
Thanks,
--Rudy
The default size of CTU in HM model is 64x64.
I was wondering what is the advantage of having a CTU 64x64 vs a CTU of 32x32?
Because to me the maximum transfer size is TU 32x32, then what is the point of having a CTU of 64x64?
The only advantage that I can think of, if maybe all the four CUs inside a CTU have the same motion vectors, then we can save some bits in encoding the motion vector.
Even I don't see a much advantage if we use use the "bypass" mode, where we bypass the TU.
I have a feeling that deciding on a CTU size of 64x64 must have more pronounced advantages over having a CTU size of 32x32, that I may be overlooking !
Can someone tell me the real advantages of having a CTU size of 64x64 vs 32x32 ?
Thanks,
--Rudy