Log in

View Full Version : Recommended settings in my case? mts files from camcorder


Perenista
10th October 2014, 03:21
Guys, I have purchased a camcorder from JVC, the GZ-EX210, and it saves all recorded videos in the highest quality in mts. MediaInfo about the mts file (it is 1080i if I am not mistaken). Using MPC-HC you cannot notice it is interlaced, but when converting to AVI/etc. it shows.


Format : BDAV
Format/Info : Blu-ray Video
File size : 299 MiB
Duration : 1mn 44s
Overall bit rate mode : Variable
Overall bit rate : 23.9 Mbps
Maximum Overall bit rate : 24.0 Mbps

Video
ID : 4113 (0x1011)
Menu ID : 1 (0x1)
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L4.0
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, ReFrames : 2 frames
Codec ID : 27
Duration : 1mn 44s
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 22.6 Mbps
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate : 29.970 fps
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Interlaced
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.364
Stream size : 283 MiB (95%)

Audio
ID : 4352 (0x1100)
Menu ID : 1 (0x1)
Format : AC-3
Format/Info : Audio Coding 3
Mode extension : CM (complete main)
Format settings, Endianness : Big
Codec ID : 129
Duration : 1mn 44s
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 256 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 16 bits
Compression mode : Lossy
Delay relative to video : -34ms
Stream size : 3.19 MiB (1%)

Text
ID : 4608 (0x1200)
Menu ID : 1 (0x1)
Format : PGS
Codec ID : 144
Duration : 1mn 44s
Delay relative to video : -34ms

Using Sony Vegas PRO 11.0 I was able to open the MTS. And I found this screen after editing, but have no idea what to insert there.

Can you recommend the settings which will give me the best possible quality? I want something as much close to lossless as possible. Don't care if the filesize would be huge or if it will take more time.

http://s28.postimg.org/7zn2n78eh/image.png (http://postimg.org/image/7zn2n78eh/)

http://s28.postimg.org/5jl99cqbt/image.png (http://postimg.org/image/5jl99cqbt/)

(Click to enlarge)

In the 1st image I selected NONE (progressive scan) as Field order, pixel A.R. 1,0000 and FPS 29,970 (NTSC) / Interleave every 0,250 seconds. Are these settings OK?

Do you have any advice on what options I should use?

My goal is to upload the videos edited by Vegas to Youtube, and keep the original file with the best possible quality. ;)

Emulgator
18th October 2014, 14:58
To keep the original file -> I would just keep it, not transcode it and probably throw away the original.
The source was interlaced, and probably TFF, so I would keep any intermediate interlaced and TFF.
For max quality I would rather bob to 59,94p using (Q)TGMC.

Youtube transcodes and butchers anyways, no matter what you throw at it.
For this occasion only you still may want to have a progressive version.
and for this you may give the job of deinterlacing back to Vegas as you did.

But this throws away temporal information that was still there in your interlaced source.
Keep your source still.