TempLinearApproximate plugin

[Joachim Buambeki]

Thanks for this script, Mystery Keeper!
Would you consider incorporating frequency separation into it as discussed in this post and the following ones (https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1806167#post1806167)? If you have questions about why and how I will do my best to explain.

Also, would it be possible to have different strengths of denoising for luma and chroma?
With HQ sources like ProRes or RAW, straight from a large sensor, ≥4K cameras, removing most/all chroma noise but only some of the luma noise is enough in most cases.

[Mystery Keeper]

Thanks for this script, Mystery Keeper!
Would you consider incorporating frequency separation into it as discussed in this post and the following ones (https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1806167#post1806167)? If you have questions about why and how I will do my best to explain.

Also, would it be possible to have different strengths of denoising for luma and chroma?
With HQ sources like ProRes or RAW, straight from a large sensor, ≥4K cameras, removing most/all chroma noise but only some of the luma noise is enough in most cases.I'll look into it sometime after I'm done with current vsedit milestone. TLA has an argument for the processed planes. You give it [0] for luma and [1, 2] for chroma. Same argument for the script.