Darksoul71
1st July 2013, 15:09
Hello fellow doomers,
so far I have used a few crudely hacked AutoIt script plus MKVToolNix and ffmpeg to backup my BDs.
Don't ask why but most available tools I tried did not cover my needs or where overfunctional.
Lately I have run into some issues with incomplete MKV files encoded with ffmpeg in h264 from MakeMKV sources.
Since Ripbot encoded them perfectly, I thought it might be a smart idea to "mimic" the way it works, e.g. switching over to AVISynth scripts with DirectShow source as encoding source.
Two questions arise for me right now ! May be someone can shed some light into my darkness :)
1) Do I gain benefit from using avs2yuv under Windows and piping the output to ffmpeg ? Or is it like the AVISynth wiki stated:
"This way is obsolete since these programs have native AviSynth support now. "
2) While I am modifying my script anyhow, would I see a benefit by replacing ffmpeg with lib264 with native x264 ?
I mean, I am please with the quality ffmpeg produces in the vanilla h264 presets and crf-based encoding as much as I am pleased with the output Ripbot produces with x264.
Given the fact that I do not need to fullfill special codec requirements for a BD standalone since I play back on my HTPC, does native x264 give me any other advantages ?
Mind you that I do not want to ask any kind of "whats best" question but rather like to hear other peoples experiences / opinions.
Even if "versus" sounds like the kind of questions which are disliked here.
Thanks in advance,
D$
so far I have used a few crudely hacked AutoIt script plus MKVToolNix and ffmpeg to backup my BDs.
Don't ask why but most available tools I tried did not cover my needs or where overfunctional.
Lately I have run into some issues with incomplete MKV files encoded with ffmpeg in h264 from MakeMKV sources.
Since Ripbot encoded them perfectly, I thought it might be a smart idea to "mimic" the way it works, e.g. switching over to AVISynth scripts with DirectShow source as encoding source.
Two questions arise for me right now ! May be someone can shed some light into my darkness :)
1) Do I gain benefit from using avs2yuv under Windows and piping the output to ffmpeg ? Or is it like the AVISynth wiki stated:
"This way is obsolete since these programs have native AviSynth support now. "
2) While I am modifying my script anyhow, would I see a benefit by replacing ffmpeg with lib264 with native x264 ?
I mean, I am please with the quality ffmpeg produces in the vanilla h264 presets and crf-based encoding as much as I am pleased with the output Ripbot produces with x264.
Given the fact that I do not need to fullfill special codec requirements for a BD standalone since I play back on my HTPC, does native x264 give me any other advantages ?
Mind you that I do not want to ask any kind of "whats best" question but rather like to hear other peoples experiences / opinions.
Even if "versus" sounds like the kind of questions which are disliked here.
Thanks in advance,
D$