View Full Version : Do I need Azid's gain max or auto gain with -ota(-g max) in BeSweet?
oddball
11th February 2002, 10:24
I'm a little confused. Do I need either of those selected in the Azid settings when -ota(-g max) is used? I have Dynamic Compression normal and Gain max (No auto gain) selected at present.
DSPguru
11th February 2002, 10:51
dynamic compression is a standalone feature.
if BeSweet see -azid( -g max ) AND -ota( -g max ) , it executes the -ota( -g max ) engine (smart normalizer).
-azid( -g max ) will usually find lower gain values than -ota( -g max ).
oddball
11th February 2002, 19:29
Is it preferable to leave Dynamic Compression off or on?
user
11th February 2002, 19:40
"if BeSweet see -azid( -g max ) AND -ota( -g max ) , it executes the -ota( -g max ) engine (smart normalizer).
-azid( -g max ) will usually find lower gain values than -ota( -g max )."
Hi,
is this the reason why sound has often a quite silent volume, if converted with azid and so on ?
I have not tried ota yet.
Do you recommend it over maximizing with azid ?
Has ota only influence to max gain ?
Or does it dynamic range compression, too ?
Or is still azid normal dynamic range recommended ?
Originally posted by DSPguru
if BeSweet see -azid( -g max ) AND -ota( -g max ) , it executes the -ota( -g max ) engine (smart normalizer).
-azid( -g max ) will usually find lower gain values than -ota( -g max ).
Is this still the case? Can you recommend one over the other?
DSPguru
28th May 2002, 17:32
-azid( -g max ) is faster,
-ota( -g max ) has clips smoother for better quality.
no compression involved.
@N_F
i believe you're a GKnot user, ain't you ?
GKnot is using -ota( -G max ) , this is one-pass normalization (it's the fastest).
pacohaas
28th May 2002, 18:59
Originally posted by DSPguru
-azid( -g max ) is faster,
-ota( -g max ) has clips smoother for better quality.
no compression involved.
so if we wanted better quality(speed doesn't matter), it would be better to use -azid( -c normal ) -ota( -g max ) instead of -azid( -c normal -g max )? and i'm not at home right now, but i would assume also that -azid( -c normal ) -ota( -g 6db ) would work instead of -azid( -c normal -g 6db )?
DSPguru
28th May 2002, 20:31
in most cases, you won't meet overflows after finding maximal gain, so ota isn't better.
for a constant value i would go on ota.
Originally posted by DSPguru
-azid( -g max ) is faster,
-ota( -g max ) has clips smoother for better quality.
no compression involved.
@N_F
i believe you're a GKnot user, ain't you ?
GKnot is using -ota( -G max ) , this is one-pass normalization (it's the fastest).
Yes, I use GKnot, but only for creating the .avs file. I do all the encoding with Besweet/VirtualDub/Nandub.
So the difference is hardly noticable between -azid( -g max ) and -ota( -g max ) I assume...
DSPguru
29th May 2002, 16:40
Originally posted by N_F
So the difference is hardly noticable between -azid( -g max ) and -ota( -g max ) I assume... yes, but you're invited to judge for yourself.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.