View Full Version : FineSharp()
digitech
6th November 2012, 04:23
mt_masktools-26.dll is the one you want, place in avisynth\plugins directory, 25 means avisynth 2.5x, 26= 2.60
I use the pre-release with sse3 fix of removegrain, repair is also included
2.6 mt (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=148782)
Hi turbojet can you give a little advice about how to make finesharp work with the avisynth version you mention above, thanks!
AzraelNewtype
6th November 2012, 21:02
How can I get it to process only the right half of the image so I can more easily see what effect it is having? The option in ffdshow is disabled (cannot be checked). Thanks.
l = crop(0,0,-width()/2,0)
r = (width()/2,0,0,0)
stackhorizontal(l,r.finesharp())
Or l.finesharp if that strikes you fancy, I don't know I'm not your mother.
Admittedly I haven't tested this yet, so it might break spectacularly, but it seems right. Certainly the right idea.
hdboy
7th November 2012, 03:50
l = crop(0,0,-width()/2,0)
r = (width()/2,0,0,0)
stackhorizontal(l,r.finesharp())
Or l.finesharp if that strikes you fancy, I don't know I'm not your mother.
Admittedly I haven't tested this yet, so it might break spectacularly, but it seems right. Certainly the right idea.
thanks. you meant
r = crop(width()/2,0,0,0)
right?
AzraelNewtype
7th November 2012, 10:08
thanks. you meant
r = crop(width()/2,0,0,0)
right?
Oh, yeah it helps to call functions rather than just list arguments, welp.
sexus
15th November 2012, 00:24
dont think this does much if anything at all of worth if your already using madvr and the lav package with ffdshow raw video filter in mpchc, please correct me if im wrong
heres a reply from 6233638<
"One of the results posted looked interesting, but generally sharpening is detrimental to image quality in my experience, and I would certainly not want to be sharpening while upsampling the image"
whats youre oppinions on this?
Didée
15th November 2012, 01:38
> please correct me if im wrong
Okay. Hereby you are corrected.
> whats youre oppinions on this?
Frankly? Sounds like self-profiling by coming up with a definitve statement, in a matter that's way too diversified to make such definite statements.
Anyway, I've no clue who this 6233638< is.
sexus
15th November 2012, 03:42
well hes a member like all of us 6233638 , he is , anyhow so you say theres more to this than meets the eye , please id like to hear everyones oppinions on this , maybe id even go for it if its deffinitely worthwhile , thanks in advance
Asmodian
15th November 2012, 04:24
It is easy to see if it is worthwhile, just try it!
I usually don't like extra sharpening either but some sources do look much better with it. There really is no "for everything anywhere" option.
This is another area where it is up to the user to decide what they like.
I don't think using MadVR+LAV or not has anything to do with it. Lanczos vs whatever EVR uses isn't that different.
sexus
15th November 2012, 10:41
thanks that explains abit more
Soulhunter
14th December 2012, 23:14
Fein fein...
Any chance this gets implemented directly into ffdshow some day? ;)
Jenyok
28th March 2013, 13:08
There are some functions in PhotoShop
.
"Menu -> Flter -> Sharpen ->
...Sharpen
...Sharpen Edge
...Sharpen More
...Smart Sharpen
...Unsharp Mask"
.
.
Question.
.
Which functions and scripts in AviSynth are corresponded (~equal) to functions in PhotoShop ?
See text upper.
.
gildardo
22nd December 2014, 03:54
I've been fiddling with the settings of this filter --- great one, by the way, so thank you Didée --- but I have to ask, what is the equation implemented by it? I'm playing with lstr and pstr and though I see some changes, I have no exact idea as to what I'm changing exactly. Also, I am not sure that what the exact effect of ldmp is mathematically --- I can SEE an effect, I'm just not sure what it is that I'm seeing.
Magik Mark
24th November 2019, 09:21
Is it now compatible with 2160p hdr sources?
real.finder
12th April 2020, 16:19
Is it now compatible with 2160p hdr sources?
try with this https://github.com/realfinder/AVS-Stuff/raw/Community/avs%202.5%20and%20up/FineSharp.avsi
WorBry
18th February 2021, 03:03
I've been testing various denoiser and sharpener combinations for post-processing of 1080p60 Cineform (Filmscan 2) avi exports graded in DaVinci Resolve. Unfortunately, NR is only available in the Studio version of Resolve and I'm using the free version. Denoising before importing into Resolve would mean transcoding the native clips (HD-AVC.mp4), which is a PITA.
Testing KNLMeans with Finesharp there is definitely some benefit in a 10-bit pipeline (p210) even if the final target is 8bit 4:2:0 - I'm seeing less sharpened residual noise than when processing in YV12.
Typical script:
LWLibavVideoSource("{Path}:\Cineform_export.avi", fpsnum=60000, fpsden=1001,format="YUV422P10")
KNLMeansCL(h=1.5)
Finesharp(sstr=3.0)
ConvertBits(8)
ConverttoYV12(interlaced=false)
KLNMeans in combination with CAS gives quite nice results (clean any way), but that's not really the kind of adaptive sharpening I'm looking for.
Are there other AVISynth sharpeners with HBD support to test?
Edit: Oh, I see LSFMod was ported for HBD also.
https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=1813105#post1813105
That's good to know. Haven't been on the forum for a good while.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.