View Full Version : force film vs ignore pulldown
atra dies
16th September 2012, 05:38
I ran a d2v with both options and parsed them. They report the same number of frames: 161524 for a presumed progressive film with soft pulldown (98.78% FILM reported for both at end of d2v). I don't see any interlaced intros or outros, just the film. This is a film from the 70s that seems to have not had anything modern added to it. In avspmod, for the forced film d2v it reports 161131/161132 frames at the end of the slider. For ignore pulldown d2v it goes to 161523/4. Is that because of frames dropped by dgindex when forcing film?
There is also a large discrepancy between running times with ignore pulldown being the more correct.
Guest
16th September 2012, 06:16
Set Honor pulldown. Do Save project. What are the values in the following Info boxes?
Frame rate
Coded
Frame rpts
Field rpts
I can tell you what to expect from DGMPGDec, but I have no knowledge about avspmod.
If you do force film on a stream that is not exactly 3:2 soft pulled down, frames may be either added or deleted, depending on whether there is a excess or deficiency of flagged repeats. Most often some of the repeats are hard, or there is video, so there is a deficiency of repeats and frames will have to be deleted.
You can use the Parse D2V output to find the non-3:2 sections. Look for lines without a * (other than the first one in the file). Pay special attention to the start and end. Sometimes there is blackness as video.
atra dies
16th September 2012, 22:12
I should have known it was the long sequence of blackness at the beginning and end of the movie and I just saw video type responded to these parts and parsing shows no asterisk next to them. I realized later I should have mentioned it.
29.970030 fps
161525 coded
0 frame and field repeats
One 30 frame sequence at the beginning and a few at the end of black have no *.
:thanks:
Guest
16th September 2012, 23:40
0 frame and field repeats
Not possible with 98% film!
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.