Bd-rebuilder: what is a good configuration?

[lauguru]

hi what is a good configuration keeping all audio, subtitles etc ...
the good option, even if it takes many hours?
can not make more than 2 passes? 3 or more?
thanks

MULTIPROCESS=1
ENCODE_QUALITY=6 ?

[setarip_old]

Hi!

Start by using the default settings

[lauguru]

I already miss, but I'm not settle for the results. I prefer to wait more time and better quality and give me the result :)

[Th3KiNG]

same here, i prefer quality over time.
i am using default settings, in DVDRBPro... not happy... (HC Encoder)

[A.Fenderson]

@lauguru: I'm assuming you're targeting BD25 since you didn't say. For maximum video quality encoding parameters, just do this:
0. Delete your BDREBUILDER.INI file if you've been messing around in there. ;)
1. Click Settings > Encoder Settings > (uncheck) Automatic Quality Settings.
2. Click Settings > Encoder Settings > (check) Highest (very slow).
3. Click Settings > Encoder settings > (uncheck) One Pass (ABR) Encoding.

To further help get max video quality, keep only lossy audio like this:
1. Click Settings > Setup > verify that "Keep HD Audio for BD25/Alternate Intact" is unchecked.

This gets you the highest level of quality without having to mess with hidden options or downgrade audio (assuming you don't possess golden ears).

As for MULTIPROCESS=1, that may or may not speed up your encode, see jdobbs' full explanation here. (http://www.jdobbs.net/freeware/multiprocessing.html)

As for ENCODE_QUALITY=6, I can't find this fully documented, but I don't think it does what you intend (maximize quality). Maybe someone else can chime in as to what this does, but it looks like it might be an HD-DVD video-encode compatibility limiter, which won't give you better quality results. But setting this will override Highest quality settings input into the GUI (which change the .INI file to contain ENCODE_QUALITY=3), so I don't recommend it until someone who knows for sure can enlighten us.

[varekai]

@lauguru

ENCODE_QUALITY=4

- Quality: Ultra High Quality (Extremely Slow), Two Pass
- Decoding/Frame serving: X264/LAVF [4-way]
- Audio Settings: AC3:1 DTS:1 HD:0 Kbs:640

This is what I use, slow yes, but getting excellent results.

[lauguru]

A.Fenderson and varekai. Thanks ;)

[jdobbs]

@lauguru: I'm assuming you're targeting BD25 since you didn't say. For maximum video quality encoding parameters, just do this:
0. Delete your BDREBUILDER.INI file if you've been messing around in there. ;)
1. Click Settings > Encoder Settings > (uncheck) Automatic Quality Settings.
2. Click Settings > Encoder Settings > (check) Highest (very slow).
3. Click Settings > Encoder settings > (uncheck) One Pass (ABR) Encoding.

To further help get max video quality, keep only lossy audio like this:
1. Click Settings > Setup > verify that "Keep HD Audio for BD25/Alternate Intact" is unchecked.

This gets you the highest level of quality without having to mess with hidden options or downgrade audio (assuming you don't possess golden ears).

As for MULTIPROCESS=1, that may or may not speed up your encode, see jdobbs' full explanation here. (http://www.jdobbs.net/freeware/multiprocessing.html)

As for ENCODE_QUALITY=6, I can't find this fully documented, but I don't think it does what you intend (maximize quality). Maybe someone else can chime in as to what this does, but it looks like it might be an HD-DVD video-encode compatibility limiter, which won't give you better quality results. But setting this will override Highest quality settings input into the GUI (which change the .INI file to contain ENCODE_QUALITY=3), so I don't recommend it until someone who knows for sure can enlighten us.

ENCODE_QUALITY=6 is used for a custom command line. It is only meant for internal testing and very definitely isn't a higher quality level. Without proper usage (also undocumented) it could create a stream that is not BD compliant.

I would recommend never going above ENCODE_QUALITY=2 for 99% of all encodes -- but there is a "3" (available from the menu as "Highest (very slow)") and an undocumented value of "4" (unbearably slow mode for those with anal tendencies).

"5" is also undocumented and it means "Ultra fast (lowest quality)" -- it is also meant for testing and I use it when I don't care about quality because I need it to finish fast for debugging.

[lauguru]

ENCODE_QUALITY=6 is used for a custom command line. It is only meant for internal testing and very definitely isn't a higher quality level. Without proper usage (also undocumented) it could create a stream that is not BD compliant.

I would recommend never going above ENCODE_QUALITY=2 for 99% of all encodes -- but there is a "3" (available from the menu as "Highest (very slow)") and an undocumented value of "4" (unbearably slow mode for those with anal tendencies).

"5" is also undocumented and it means "Ultra fast (lowest quality)" -- it is also meant for testing and I use it when I don't care about quality because I need it to finish fast for debugging.



hello! jdobbs
then recommend not pass ENCODE_QUALITY = 4 for the highest quality without the appearance of certain errors, I understand it?

MULTIPROCESS=4
ENCODE_QUALITY=4

Quality: Ultra High Quality (Extremely Slow), Two Pass
- Decoding/Frame serving: X264/LAVF [4-way]
- Audio Settings: AC3=0 DTS=0 HD=1 Kbs=640

[jdobbs]

If you don't care about time... ENCODE_QUALITY=4 (leave out the spaces) probably won't hurt. But I'm not sure you'll see any noticable difference when compared to ENCODE_QUALITY=2 or ENCODE_QUALITY=3 -- and it's going to run a lot slower.

Multiprocess is probably best left at "1" (automatic). But if you compare the two and "4" is faster, it's okay. It depends on your system -- but sometimes higher numbers can actually be slower.

[lauguru]

just stunning! I expected to process the main part of the movie the entire disc. I have run with windows 11 and VCL player ... What a difference! .. almost imperceptible!
although I will continue with more later!:
Multiprocess = 4
ENCODE_QUALITY = 4

Quality: Ultra High Quality (Extremely Slow), Two Pass
- Decoding / Frame serving: X264/LAVF [4-way]
- Audio Settings: AC3 DTS = 0 = 0 = 1 HD = 640 Kbs

[varekai]

(unbearably slow mode for those with anal tendencies).
Hahaha... I know I'm anal... but it doesn't hurt! :D

regards

[jdobbs]

Hahaha... I know I'm anal... but it doesn't hurt! :D

regards Didn't mean any offense... ;)

[varekai]

Didn't mean any offense... ;)
None taken, I thought it was funny! :D

regards

[lauguru]

hello
bdrebuilder not use GPU acceleration support?
any command where you can activate? I have a ati 6870

[Adub]

In order to enable GPU acceleration (which is really only possible with the decoder portion), you will need software like DGDecNV (which is worthless on your ATI card) or maybe using LAVFilters for DirectShow decoding with Hardware Acceleration enabled : http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=156191

[lauguru]

definitely will use the default high quality option. The rest becomes very very slow :)

big anal moment! jajaja

[lauguru]

use open GOPs encoding, further improves the video quality for bd25?

I'm reading out there, which if activated, improved video quality, but could not work the functions of the menus. Is that true? or only affects the dvd?
only be used for the movie alone?

[lauguru]

The easiest way to customise x264's encoding time is to use the following presets:
superfast
veryfast
faster
fast
medium
slow
slower
veryslow
placebo (as this function is activated?)

[lauguru]

hello
for resize and crop
someone could tell me that the file using commando HIDDENOPTS.TXT, to fully stretch the image up and down without losing any of the image of the sides, I mean basically stretch the image without losing data bdrebuilder

(is WIDE_OFFSET=n n = .1-2.0 - Adjust start of clipping: 1=centered (default), .75=(y_start_line*.75), etc. )

http://subir.cc/images/underwold.jpg

[jdobbs]

First -- you can't get rid of the border without sacrificing some of the image. BD requires an aspect ratio of 16:9 for 1920x1080 -- that's the reason the borders are there on the original disc.

But... if you are willing to give up some of the picture on the sides, you can resize and fill the entire 16:9 area.

I'd need to know the size of the black bars... but here is an example that assumes a 1920x1080 source:

TWEAK_PASS_ONE=LanczosResize(1920,1080,160,100,1600,900)
TWEAK_PASS_TWO=LanczosResize(1920,1080,160,100,1600,900)

If you do a google search for LANCZOSRESIZE you'll see the definition related to AVISYNTH. In this example it is assumed the black bars take up 90 pixels (each) on the top and bottom of the picture.

[lauguru]

jdobbs know that I can program or edit before starting to know where the black bars as each Blu-ray has different formats.

[jdobbs]

jdobbs know that I can program or edit before starting to know where the black bars as each Blu-ray has different formats. Just experiment. Use this values I provided first and start a rebuild. Stop it as soon as the encoding starts for the associated M2TS... and then open the AVS file with Media Player Classic. If it looks good, resume and let it finish. If not, change the values and look again. BD-RB creates the AVS over again every time you restart. Also -- make sure you fully understand LANCZOSRESIZE before starting.

Note: As HIDDENOPTS says, tweaks are meant for expert users... if your encode fails or you have issue -- remember you have to fix it yourself. With the resizing tweak you have complete control -- and that means you can create a disc that is non-compliant or even completely garbage. Please don't expect support from others as any issues are self-inflicted.

Also, just to be clear, I am not recommending you do this... I'm just saying it is possible. In my opinion it is always better to keep the original format rather than edit it and lose part of the picture. DO NOT try creating an output size that is anything except one of the BD acceptable formats (like 1920x1080) or you will end up with trash. Also, DO NOT try creating a source area that is not exactly 16:9 -- or your image will be stretched either vertically or horizontally.

[lauguru]

Thanks, I'll do some tests then have the result.

according to this picture, that data would have to wear?

TWEAK_PASS_ONE=LanczosResize(1920,820,130,100,1600,900)
TWEAK_PASS_TWO=LanczosResize(1920,820,130,100,1600,900)

????


http://subir.cc/images/shame.jpg

[jdobbs]

Thanks, I'll do some tests then have the result.

One other caviat. Always make the output size matches the original size. Changing sizes (even if it is a legal size) with tweaks does not update the MPLS file... so if the original is 1920x1080, the first two numbers of the LanczosResize() statement has to also be 1920x1080.

[jdobbs]

jdobbs know that I can program or edit before starting to know where the black bars as each Blu-ray has different formats. Also, while it may seem that different discs have different sizes (and it may be possible), typically the wide screens are 2.4:1. That means that on a 1920x1080 source the picture (minus bars) would have a picture that is 800 pixels high (1920 / 2.4). In that instance the bars would be 140 pixels each. For that I would use:

TWEAK_PASS_ONE=LanczosResize(1920,1080,249,140,1422,800)
TWEAK_PASS_TWO=LanczosResize(1920,1080,249,140,1422,800)

But, as I mentioned, in addition to the black borders you will be clipping 249 pixels off of each side of the original picture, never to be seen again, just so it fills a 16:9 widescreen monitor.

[Edit] Actually, now that I think about it, 2.35:1 is really the most common widescreen format... but the points remain. The numbers above would still work.

[jdobbs]

Thanks, I'll do some tests then have the result.

according to this picture, that data would have to wear?

TWEAK_PASS_ONE=LanczosResize(1920,820,130,100,1600,900)
TWEAK_PASS_TWO=LanczosResize(1920,820,130,100,1600,900)

????


http://subir.cc/images/shame.jpg You seem to be missing (or ignoring) the point I keep making in my responses here and in response to your PMs. You CANNOT RESIZE WITHOUT ALSO REMOVING FROM THE SIDES. So the example you are using here is impossible for a video that is going to be output to BD format.

By changing the output's height to 820 pixels you have just made a picture that CANNOT WORK as a video source on a Blu-ray disc. It is incompatible with the rules for a BD picture. Period. End of story. That is why the original authors added the upper and lower borders to begin with -- are you assuming that a professional authoring house would just add black borders for the fun of it or to annoy their customers?

When was the last time you saw a television or monitor that was 2.35 times as wide as it's height? In other words -- even if you could get this picture to work, your TV would have to add the borders anyway.

[lauguru]

ok I put a test:
TWEAK_PASS_ONE = LanczosResize (1920,1080,249,140,1422,800)
TWEAK_PASS_TWO = LanczosResize (1920,1080,249,140,1422,800)

Would not be bad, that bdrebuilder following versions, you can see resize and crop

[jdobbs]

ok I put a test:
TWEAK_PASS_ONE = LanczosResize (1920,1080,249,140,1422,800)
TWEAK_PASS_TWO = LanczosResize (1920,1080,249,140,1422,800)

Would not be bad, that bdrebuilder following versions, you can see resize and crop

Using those parameters should give you a good picture. You'll just lose a little of the original picture off both sides.

I could add resizing with cropping for widescreen sources to BD-RB -- but most people would rather keep the picture in it's original theatrical state. It is also dangerous, as forgetting to turn it off will crop the top and sides off of other (non widescreen) sources as well.

[lauguru]

You seem to be missing (or ignoring) the point I keep making in my responses here and in response to your PMs. You CANNOT RESIZE WITHOUT ALSO REMOVING FROM THE SIDES. So the example you are using here is impossible for a video that is going to be output to BD format.

By changing the output's height to 820 pixels you have just made a picture that CANNOT WORK as a video source on a Blu-ray disc. It is incompatible with the rules for a BD picture. Period. End of story. That is why the original authors added the upper and lower borders to begin with -- are you assuming that a professional authoring house would just add black borders for the fun of it or to annoy their customers?

When was the last time you saw a television or monitor that was 2.35 times as wide as it's height? In other words -- even if you could get this picture to work, your TV would have to add the borders anyway.
I'm sorry, I'm using a translator. There are no English. So maybe we do not understand well :)

[lauguru]

and you can not just cut the picture above and below? and keep the sides without touching?
and that would be an image is anamorphic (distorted), but at least no information is lost.

[jdobbs]

and you can not just cut the picture above and below? and keep the sides without touching?
and that would be an image is anamorphic (distorted), but at least no information is lost.

No. You cannot. It would result in a size that is illegal. It is unlikely your player would even accept it or attempt to play it. But that would depend on the player's firmware and how it was written. Even if it did work on one player, it would likely fail on another -- so you'd never be able to upgrade. I would recommend never creating a disc that isn't compliant with the BD standards.

[lauguru]

then better give up my attempts to do so see.

[MrT.]

I have an i7 930 intel, using windows 7 64bit, it takes 8 hours to shrink 44gb to 21.4 , keep hd audio on(1 audio 5.1 truehd, 1 sub), movie and menu only. High quality(default) 2 pass. Does this sound about right, or do i need to look into tinkering with things?

[lauguru]

I have an i7 930 intel, using windows 7 64bit, it takes 8 hours to shrink 44gb to 21.4 , keep hd audio on(1 audio 5.1 truehd, 1 sub), movie and menu only. High quality(default) 2 pass. Does this sound about right, or do i need to look into tinkering with things?

use this confg,personally greatly improves the quality even more!
if you are looking for quality, according to my tests, the best results I have left.

edit BDREBUILDER.INI and paste:

[Options]
VERSION=0.41.0.1
MODE=0
AUTO_BIAS=3
B_PYRAMID=1
MULTIPROCESS=4
MIN_M2TS_SIZE=1
MIN_PLAYLIST_MINS=1
ENCODE_QUALITY=3
ONEPASS_ENCODING=0
AUTO_QUALITY=0
TARGET_SIZE=24995
AUDIO_TO_KEEP=all
SUBS_TO_KEEP=all
SD_CONVERT=0
OPEN_GOP=1
RESIZE_1080=0
DEINTERLACE=1
SD_TO_1080=0
CONVERT_WIDE=1
DTS_REENCODE=0
AC3_REENCODE=0
AC3_640=1
AC3_192=0
KEEP_HD_AUDIO=1
AVCHD=1
REMOVE_WORKFILES=0
MOVIE_ONLY_LOOP=1
REMOVE_OUTPUT=0
USE_FILTERS=0
BDMV_CERT_ONLY=1
USE_LAVF=1
IVTC_PULLDOWN=0
ASSUME_DVD_PAL=0
UNMASK_CHAPTER=0
COMPLETION_BEEP=0
DGDECNV=0
AUDIO_TRACK_LIMIT=0
SUBTITLE_TRACK_LIMIT=0
CUSTOM_TARGET_SIZE=24995
PRIORITY_CLASS=1
QUICK_EXTRAS=0
AUTO_BURN=0
[Paths]

[MrT.]

thx lauguru . I was just curious if 8 hours to do high quality(default), two pass was a good time, and if not, I'd maybe look into changing setting or upgrade.
90% of the time I do auto, but these Dexter BD's are big with no extras, thought turning it up to high quality would be good.
I turned on lavf in settings, see if that improves things.

[jdobbs]

thx lauguru . I was just curious if 8 hours to do high quality(default), two pass was a good time, and if not, I'd maybe look into changing setting or upgrade.
90% of the time I do auto, but these Dexter BD's are big with no extras, thought turning it up to high quality would be good.
I turned on lavf in settings, see if that improves things. That sounds really long for your setup. I normally do HQ encodes in about 3 hours. But it would depend on the total length (in time) of the disc being encoded. A disc containing 4 hours of video is going to take twice as long as one containing 2 hours, even if they are the same size.

[MrT.]

Thx for the input jdobbs, I did the 2nd disc from Season 1 and it took 7 hours with lavf turned on. The output size was smaller in this disc (20.7) then the 1st (21.4). There is 4 episodes on each disc, that's about 3 hrs and 34 minutes. I checked what auto would do and it was gonna encode at Good, which is the usual choice it uses.
Is this because there is hardly any action scenes? I thought big video size = the need for HQ, but does not seem to be the case. I think it shows in the output sizes, correct me where im wrong and your thoughts plz .

[jdobbs]

Thx for the input jdobbs, I did the 2nd disc from Season 1 and it took 7 hours with lavf turned on. The output size was smaller in this disc (20.7) then the 1st (21.4). There is 4 episodes on each disc, that's about 3 hrs and 34 minutes. I checked what auto would do and it was gonna encode at Good, which is the usual choice it uses.
Is this because there is hardly any action scenes? I thought big video size = the need for HQ, but does not seem to be the case. I think it shows in the output sizes, correct me where im wrong and your thoughts plz . It's based on the size (in time) of the source and the output bitrate. If you are writing to a BD-25, it is rare that anything more than "Good" is needed. The bitrate is always pretty high. I'd be surprised if you could see a difference between a disc encoded with a "Good" setting selected by automatic and a manual selection of "High Quality".

[lauguru]

It's based on the size (in time) of the source and the output bitrate. If you are writing to a BD-25, it is rare that anything more than "Good" is needed. The bitrate is always pretty high. I'd be surprised if you could see a difference between a disc encoded with a "Good" setting selected by automatic and a manual selection of "High Quality".


hello jdobbs
I personally, if I notice the difference. It's just testing, it shows much more if the BD50 has many videos or extras, is less noticeable if the movie basically takes just extras. but still I confirm that there is enough difference between the different quality modes. At least since check the GOPS, further improved the visual level. So although it takes more like min left since high quality, and highest in the vast majority of conversions.

indeed, you could not add to the power function bdrebuilder manually choose the audio you want to keep and quality.
the program encrypts all dtshd ma to dts 5.1 1500kps default when you choose not to keep hd audio.
I mean, is able to choose in each audio, if you want to maintain that quality or reduce it.

default is:

dtshdma english = dts 1.5
dtshdma spanih = dts 1.5
dtshdma french = dts1.5
Russian AC3 5.1 = AC3 5.1

example to add:
dtshdma english = dts 1.5
dtshdma spanish = dtshdma
dtshdma french = dtshdma
Russian AC3 5.1 = 2.0 ac3 192kps

I do not know if I'm explaining well :thanks:

[MrT.]

I did the disc in auto (Good) last night, and it only took an hour and 40 minutes. It's the second pass that takes twice as long as the first. Is this normal, if not what could be the reason?

I know I should be fine with Auto, and I have been using it 90% of the time. It just sometimes I see these threads and a lot of people going bananas how the highest quality looks awesome. But then after some thought and sense, I go back to the dependable Auto.

A week ago I was thinking about something I read, how to first pass in DVD-Rebuilder is to just read and get information (something along those lines) and the second pass is to encode. Then I thought maybe the same applies to BD-RB and that's what started the whole thing. If the second pass is normally twice as long as the first, I gonna stay away, if not I'm gonna do a reformat. 8 months ago I was getting blue screen so I reformat and the installation failed a few times during install, but managed to get er done, but then day later I bricked motherboard. Got motherboard replaced, and haven't done a fresh installation of Windows. I should do that, be good to install Windows smoothly with no interruptions.
cheers man.

[RobertM]

If the second pass is normally twice as long as the first, I gonna stay away

The second pass IS normally longer than the first. I do all my rebuilds at "High quality" 2-pass, and the 2nd pass is several times longer in duration. For instance, in my latest rebuild (31GB source file, movie only, 2hr 02min film duration), pass 1 took 1hr 07min while pass 2 took 3hr 40min.

This is with an i7-950.

[jdobbs]

Exactly. That's a function of the way X264 works. There are lots of encoding features that are time consuming but aren't necessary during the first pass -- because it is essentially a data gathering pass. The second pass, being the one that actually produces the video, needs to reap the benefit from them-- so they are used, and that's why it is slower. The higher the quality setting, the more time difference you will likely see between the two passes.

[lauguru]

auto-answer me myself and thank jdobbs
bdrebuilder is nop capable of extracting audio from Ucontrol pip to fix add DTSX_ENABLE = 1 in bdrebuilder. ini

http://subir.cc/images/bugucontro.jpg http://subir.cc/images/bugcorregi.jpg

[jdobbs]

Just remember, some players won't recognize it after it is remuxed. I have no idea why.

[lauguru]

Just remember, some players won't recognize it after it is remuxed. I have no idea why.

I have noticed that, with powerdvd12 and having chosen in the setup bdrebuilder not keep hd audio. first test result is that the audio does not come Ucontrol.
leave another test tonight keeps hd audio option.
Tomorrow, I will discuss the result, if successful there!
Perhaps the problem comes around, it detects the DTS Express, as a hd audio and the program will make a mess, and delete it


.:confused:

[lauguru]

hello
the thing is very curious, would erase all the work again, when I got to thinking the player play with ArcSoft TotalMedia Theatre. And the result is that it works, but you have to put in the program, the audio output as dts mixture. We already heard correctly Ucontrol pip. An accomplishment.

http://subir.cc/images/contabad.jpg


UPDATE: write files to bd with imgburn and Ucontrol and works perfectly in reader bd philips bd3200

[lauguru]

hello
someone could tell me, how to use the avs denoise filter and grain reduction.
Commands that must be put?

http://subir.cc/images/sinttugog.jpg

To do this:

http://latoninf.free.fr/d9/MCTD/300_0SRC.png http://latoninf.free.fr/d9/MCTD/300_3MCTDveryhigh.png



or this:

http://forum.doom9.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=5710&stc=1&d=1145277292


Required Filters:
http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/MCTemporalDenoise

Note: You do not necessarily need all of these filters for this script to function for you. There are special modes that enable the use of specific filters at specific times, but these are only used when necessary. Just to be safe, make sure you have all of the filters listed below in you "Plugins" folder.
MVTools (v2.5.10) http://avisynth.org.ru/mvtools/mvtools2.html#download
MaskTools (v2.0a43) http://manao4.free.fr/masktools-v2.0a48.zip
LSFmod (v1.9) http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/LSFmod
FFT3Dgpu (v0.8.2.7) or FFT3Dfilter (v2.1.1) http://avisynth.org.ru/fft3dfilter/fft3dfilter.html
TTempsmooth (v0.9.4) http://avisynth.org.ru/docs/english/externalfilters/ttempSmooth.htm
RemoveGrain + Repair (v1.0PR) http://home.arcor.de/kassandro/prerelease/RemoveGrain-1.0.rar
Deblock (v1.2) http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/DeBlock
Deblock_QED (25.may.2010) http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/Deblock_QED
DctFilter (v0.0.1.4) http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/DCTFilter
EEDI2 (v0.9.2) http://web.missouri.edu/~kes25c/EEDI2v092.zip
SangNom (v1.0beta) http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/SangNom
GradFun2DBmod (v1.5) http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/GradFun2DBmod
GradFun2db (v1.0) http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=108681
AddGrainC (v1.5) http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=111849


All-in-one installer beta: http://www.sendspace.com/file/1gggec





Thanks in advance for the help

[jdobbs]

So what filter are you trying to use? You list a lot of them. I hope you're not planning to use them all. It's easy to use them -- you just add them to the filter editor. If you don't have them in the AVISYNTH plug-in folder you may have to add the load command.

I'd suggest you go to an AVISYNTH site and get familiar with how to use it first -- the use of AVISYNTH filters is way beyond the scope of this sub-forum.

By the way... the example looks a lot better before the filtering IMHO. You lose all the detail.

[lauguru]

So what filter are you trying to use? You list a lot of them. I hope you're not planning to use them all. It's easy to use them -- you just add them to the filter editor. If you don't have them in the AVISYNTH plug-in folder you may have to add the load command.

I'd suggest you go to an AVISYNTH site and get familiar with how to use it first -- the use of AVISYNTH filters is way beyond the scope of this sub-forum.

By the way... the example looks a lot better before the filtering IMHO. You lose all the detail.


not only intend to remove grain. therefore I command you could say, is to be put to the highest quality. Although much later :thanks: