View Full Version : Is this pure interlaced video?
Forteen88
5th February 2012, 20:33
Hi, I wonder, is this pure interlaced video?
www.mediafire.com/?iliba6dkgl5vw2j
To determine if it´s pure interlaced I tried putting SeparateFields() to see if there were movement every frame, but it doesn´t seem to work :P Should I add AssumeTFF before SeparateFields()? When I do that, the video-movements floats fine.
Thanks
sneaker_ger
5th February 2012, 22:04
Looks progressive to me, albeit with horrible quality. Who knows who grinded that video before...
Don't know what problems you were having with SeparateFields().
Forteen88
6th February 2012, 22:06
Looks progressive to me, albeit with horrible quality. Who knows who grinded that video before...
Don't know what problems you were having with SeparateFields().Thanks, you´re right. Sry, I used the endlogo with seems to be progressive, but the main-video seems interlaced:
http://www.mediafire.com/?5r9gib7f6sl5ob0
Annoying that they mix interlaced video with progressive...
Weird, when I use old DGMPGDec1.5.8 then the mainvideo shows as uneven motion with SeparateFields(), but when I use ffms-2.16 it got floating motion (interlaced) with SeparateFields(), maybe because I use "honor flag" in DGMPGDec?
sneaker_ger
6th February 2012, 22:56
This is true interlaced, so there should be no pulldown flags DGMPGDec could honor.
If the video is jumping back and forth after SeparateFields() then it just means the field order was wrong, which can indeed be fixed with either AssumeBFF() or AssumeTFF() respectively.
Forteen88
6th February 2012, 23:13
This is true interlaced, so there should be no pulldown flags DGMPGDec could honor.
If the video is jumping back and forth after SeparateFields() then it just means the field order was wrong, which can indeed be fixed with either AssumeBFF() or AssumeTFF() respectively.Thanks.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.