View Full Version : TMPEnc VMW5 and x264: slow or not?
deekey777
16th March 2011, 12:47
Hello everyone!
Currently I'm playing with the VMW5 (trial). It's really cool compared to other commercial converters. You get more freedom and other blabla.
And it uses x264.
My PC:
Q6600 (2,4 GHz), HD4850, Win7 x64 SP1.
Source is a 18 secs long Blu-ray sample. Target: 720p Main@3.1 (CABAC), CBR (4 MBit/s).
It takes ~1 minute to encode this video. A bit too long, ins't it?
PS:
Compared to other commercial software VMW5 is IMO perfect to convert videos for my iPhone 4.
Blue_MiSfit
20th March 2011, 01:09
I believe that x264 is broken in TMPGEnc. No idea why, but it's hugely slower than vanilla x264cli according to my tests.
Derek
kolak
20th March 2011, 17:44
Yes- there is something wrong (speed wise) in x264 implementation in TMPEG.
Andrew
Didée
20th March 2011, 23:41
Seriously. Could it be that x264 was slowed down *intentionally*? After all, a good part of the advertising roll is touting the oh-so-fast GPU encoder. Now, the insiders know that efficient GPU encoding is not self-evident but rather problematic, and that x264 driven by prevailing Quadcores delivers a better quality/speed ratio than any available GPU encoder. (At least that's my level of information, I don't know about 5-digit $$$$$ professional software packages.)
You don't need any "bugs" to slow down x264. Simply disable a few or all CPU optimisations, and x264 will be pretty slow. And in that state, it's a nice counterpart to the oh-so-fast GPU encoder, and to the Quicksync encoder just as well - no matter if driven by SB (quicky) or running "generic" (slohooow).
I don't want to force a conspiration theory. But somehow, it would really fit in the picture.
Dark Shikari
21st March 2011, 03:32
I was told that the slow speed was due to their filters.
InsulinJunkie
23rd March 2011, 05:11
Seriously. Could it be that x264 was slowed down *intentionally*?
Considering QuickSync took a similar speed hit when I gave the trial a spin (compared to the QuickSync implementation in other programs), I don't think so.
deekey777
29th March 2011, 15:50
Oh, that's sad.
kolak
29th March 2011, 21:47
I was told that the slow speed was due to their filters.
I did not use any and it was still slow.
Andrew
deekey777
28th December 2011, 20:29
Any changes?
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.