View Full Version : How to deal with this? (field misalignment)
bin_ch
26th October 2010, 12:57
Sorry for such a title, don't even know how to describe this. Will edit it after someone tell me what is this called.
Screenshot here:
http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/452/96938514.th.png (http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/452/96938514.png)
A clip of 5MB:
http://www.mediafire.com/?ky1hxbeba19rey0
I guess it's not interlacing (trying deinterlacing didn't give good result).
Judging from the text, it looks like two fields misplaced vertically by a small amout of pixels?
Thanks in advance.
LogicDeLuxe
26th October 2010, 13:43
Looks like scaled interlace material, even though the source seems to be progressive.
Well, the sharpness is gone in this process. But the artifacts can be deals with by deinterlacing the video and scale it back to the original field's heights, and then interleave the fields back to progressive frames.
bin_ch
28th October 2010, 05:05
Thanks for the reply, LogicDeLuxe,
but I'm not sure I agree with you for it being scaled interlace material. Look at the text which is static at the end of the clip, it's also affected, which I don't think will happen on scaled interlace material. Or am I wrong?
*.mp4 guy
28th October 2010, 05:57
This is a clear cut case of field misalignment. It happens when video is resized as separate fields without taking into account that when a video is stored as fields, those fields each have a unique spatial offset relative to the other. It can be fixed within the limits of linear interpolation if you know the exact way in which the misalignment was introduced, obviously such information is not usually available. Barring an exact solution you are left with various flavors of blur, which all essentially function by removing the aliased high frequency vertical information that differentiates the fields from each other.
dansrfe
28th October 2010, 06:29
Is there a way to test by trial and error for matching misalignment?^
wonkey_monkey
28th October 2010, 16:46
It looks to me like however it happened, the end result if that there are two copies of the "clean" original, offset by two pixels vertically.
David
bin_ch
31st October 2010, 07:08
Thanks for your replies.
But I still have no clue what I could do with it. Anyone could show me a sample script that I can play with?
cretindesalpes
31st October 2010, 11:26
SeparateFields ()
Spline36Resize (Width (), Height () * 2)
Weave ()
Spline36Resize (Width (), Height () / 2)
Didée
31st October 2010, 15:02
That's too complicated. ;)
Bob(-.6,.8)
Merge(SelectEven,SelectOdd)
You won't get it much better than that, as far as simple field juggling is concerned.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.